On 2018-05-20 07:26, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
Writing just for myself -- not for GnuPG and not for Enigmail and
definitely not for my employer -- I put together a postmortem on Efail.
You may find it worth reading. You may also not. Your mileage will
probably vary. :)
even shorter,
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
On 2016-04-28 08:20, Werner Koch wrote:
Everyone is going to steal this.
FWIW: Perry E. Metzger gives
On 2016-04-02 11:42, Peter Lebbing wrote:
To reiterate, apt will always use GnuPG 1.4 from the gnupg package (and
gpgv from the gpgv package). You can use GnuPG 2.0 by starting your
command line with gpg2 as the program name.
This is all for Debian jessie. In the next release, some things will
On 2016-04-01 18:21, Peter Lebbing wrote:
On 01/04/16 10:21, mick crane wrote:
from what I read I don't think I can use gpg2 because
Debian GNU/Linux 8 (jessie)apt uses gpg1 at present.
GnuPG 1.4 and GnuPG 2.x are co-installable, they can function
side-by-side. If you take the Jessie GnuPG
On 2016-04-01 06:49, Viktor Dick wrote:
Are you sure that you are using gpg2? private-keys-v1.d only contains
private keys for gpg2. gpg1 stores them in ~/.gnupg/secring.gpg or
something like that. If enigmail uses gpg2 and you created your key
with
gpg1, they will not see the same keys.
On 2016-04-01 04:35, Dashamir Hoxha wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 4:05 AM, mick crane <mick.cr...@gmail.com>
wrote:
First what I would like to do is find a configure file for gnupg ?
Did you check ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf ?
If it does not exist just create it.
Ah OK, so there is no other
hello,
I made a key pair a couple of years ago but I never used them.
Now I try to make new Debian email server ( just for me ) all nice and
tidy.
there is enigma plugin for roundmail.
I imported my private and public keys and they seem to be in the keyring
as
"gnupg -K --list-secret-keys"
On 19 Apr 2015, at 06:42, Adam Gold a...@gmx.com wrote:
I'm attempting to decrypt a symmetrically encrypted tarball appx 25GB in
size. It goes as follows:
gpg [file].tar.bz2.gpg
gpg: AES256 encrypted data
gpg: encrypted with 1 passphrase
gpg: packet(7) with unknown version 41
gpg:
On 12 Mar 2015, at 23:21, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera h...@barrera.io wrote:
On 2015-03-11 17:38, Werner Koch wrote:
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 15:12, br...@minton.name said:
git.gnupg.org) don't use that certificate. Have you considered a wildcard
certificate? I know this has been discussed
Something is strange, I don't know much about this stuff but it seems important
to you to have encryption working. It is so easy these days to install an OS
automagically I would, in your case, make a fresh installation on some other
machine and do what it is you want to do to prove a point.
On 17 Jun 2014, at 21:05, Erik Josefsson erik.hjalmar.josefs...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 06/17/2014 08:12 PM, Bob (Robert) Cavanaugh wrote:
My Vote is for the armadillo, pangolin, or hedgehog. All cutecuddly until
you try to look too close...
Hedgehog is taken :-)
On 17 Jun 2014, at 17:53, Mark Rousell ma...@signal100.com wrote:
On 17/06/2014 15:55, ved...@nym.hush.com wrote:
[...]
Maybe an armored robotic #D Gnu might be a consideration.
Oh yes, excellent idea. :-)
Maybe a mask of some sort
___
12 matches
Mail list logo
