On 08.10.19 18:37, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote: > Pity, but I hope it will be better that way. In particular I hope, that > Mozilla will not follow your example and won’t entice users to proprietary > isolated keyserver [0] instead of distributed SKS network thus splitting the > keybase. And won’t promote standards [1] that suspiciously resemble > embrace-extend-and-extinguish tactics employed against PGP either. > > [0] https://keys.openpgp.org > [1] https://pep.security pEp is not against PGP, it's just PGP-supporting as much as it makes sense for interop reasons and goes beyond email already today; and it's designed from the very beginning on to support other crypto as well (agnosticism on messaging & crypto).
-- p≡p foundation: https://pep.foundation/
0xCB5738652768F7E9.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
