On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 05:21, k...@grant-olson.net said:
(Not that I'm saying there's anything wrong with using 1.4; I just doubt
ECC will be back-ported.)
Well, at some point in time we might need to do that. If there are many
ECC keys in use there is probably a need for ECC for server
Op 26-1-2011 11:02, Werner Koch schreef:
(Not that I'm saying there's anything wrong with using 1.4; I just doubt
ECC will be back-ported.)
Well, at some point in time we might need to do that. If there are many
ECC keys in use there is probably a need for ECC for server applications
as
On Jan 26, 2011, at 5:02 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 05:21, k...@grant-olson.net said:
(Not that I'm saying there's anything wrong with using 1.4; I just doubt
ECC will be back-ported.)
Well, at some point in time we might need to do that. If there are many
ECC keys in
As someone who uses GnuPG on a USB stick under Windows, I sincerely hope
that elliptical curves get added to the 1.4 trunk.
--Avi
User:Avraham
pub 3072D/F80E29F9 1/30/2009 Avi (Wikimedia-related key) avi.w...@gmail.com
Primary key fingerprint: 167C 063F 7981 A1F6 71EC ABAA 0D62 B019
On 1/26/11 3:37 PM, Avi wrote:
As someone who uses GnuPG on a USB stick under Windows, I sincerely hope
that elliptical curves get added to the 1.4 trunk.
--Avi
That was completely uninformed speculation on my part.
But I still think that like any new standard and technology, even
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 15:37 -0500, Avi wrote:
As someone who uses GnuPG on a USB stick under Windows, I sincerely
hope that elliptical curves get added to the 1.4 trunk.
I know this won't happen,... but I'd rather see a roadmap to phase out
1.x...
Maintaining to branches is not only a big
: Christoph Anton Mitterer
christoph.anton.mitte...@physik.uni-muenchen.de
To: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 22:07:08 +0100
Subject: Re: Future plans for implementation of other algorithms
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 15:37 -0500, Avi wrote:
As someone who uses GnuPG on a USB stick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
El 26-01-2011 20:29, Avi escribió:
I believe Werner had mentioned that the 1.x version would
continue to be supported due to its enhanced portability, but I
could be misremembering. Can someone official comment as to
the viability of the 1.x
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Just out of curiosity (this might be the wrong mailing list for this so
I apologize in advance if that is the case), are there any plans for
implementing any other encryption/signing algorithms in GPG and if so
what are they?
- --
Joseph Ziff
On 01/25/2011 07:59 PM, Joseph Ziff wrote:
Just out of curiosity (this might be the wrong mailing list for this so
I apologize in advance if that is the case), are there any plans for
implementing any other encryption/signing algorithms in GPG and if so
what are they?
I think it's really the
10 matches
Mail list logo