and the issue was resolved.
Very much appreciated Peter!
Thanks,
Paul Taukatch
Advanced Technologies Team / zOS Cloud Crypto
From: Peter Lebbing <pe...@digitalbrains.com>
To: Paul Taukatch/Poughkeepsie/IBM@IBMUS, gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Date: 04/26/2017 06:24 AM
Subject: Re: GPG Sig
On 24/04/17 19:23, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> The part of "cmp" that would correspond to the constant part of the DER
> encoding I do not recognise.
It is still proper ASN.1, but it encodes a slightly different structure.
I wondered whether it was DER encoded or BER encoded, because I read
that BER
On 20/04/17 21:17, Paul Taukatch wrote:
> Does anyone know exactly what this verify data is comprised of?
"data" seems to be correct: it is an EMSA-PKCS1-v1_5 encoded RSA SHA-256
signature. As RFC 3447 states:
EM = 0x00 || 0x01 || PS || 0x00 || T.
PS is a string of binary 1's to fill up the
Technologies Team / zOS Cloud Crypto
From: Kristian Fiskerstrand
<kristian.fiskerstr...@sumptuouscapital.com>
To: Paul Taukatch/Poughkeepsie/IBM@IBMUS, gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Date: 04/21/2017 06:29 AM
Subject: Re: GPG Signature Verification
On 04/21/2017 09:16 AM, Kr
On 04/21/2017 09:16 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 04/20/2017 09:17 PM, Paul Taukatch wrote:
>> I've attached my public key and debug log but please let me know if there
>> is any other information that might be helpful.
>
> The first reference that springs to mind is [RFC4880] Section
On 04/20/2017 09:17 PM, Paul Taukatch wrote:
> I've attached my public key and debug log but please let me know if there
> is any other information that might be helpful.
The first reference that springs to mind is [RFC4880] Section 5.2.4.
Computing Signatures
References:
[RFC4880]
Hello and thank you for taking the time to help out!
I am developing my own implementation of the PGP specification and have a
question regarding the signature generation/verification for Transferable
Public Keys that maybe one of you could help shed some light on. Currently
I create a single
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 22:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Interestingly, with GPGol both signatures verified correctly!
It uses MIME parser code I wrote and thus tehre is some chance that it
actually worked ;-)
While attempts to use GPG4Win directly (open the email piece and
run GPG4Win on the
Interestingly, with GPGol both signatures verified correctly!
It uses MIME parser code I wrote and thus there is
some chance that it actually worked ;-)
Yes it worked! :-)
While attempts to use GPG4Win directly (open
the email piece and run GPG4Win on the Current
Window) fail with BAD
You're getting Bad signature because gpg can't
find the key.
I've imported the key manually, and the result is still the same (Bad
signature). GPGol has no problem verifying signature over that same
message in the same Outlook window.
And it can't find it because the keyserver helper
program
I've tried to verify signature of the email that arrived from gnupg
mailing list (sent by Ryan).
Verification fails, with the following error message. I'm using
GPG-v.1.4.7, and Thunderbird/Enigmail.
Could somebody with a clue explain me what's wrong, and whether it's a
problem with my config
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Verification fails, with the following error message. I'm using
GPG-v.1.4.7, and Thunderbird/Enigmail.
That seems to be TB problem. I have no problems to verify the mail.
--charset utf8 --batch --no-tty --status-fd 2 -d,gpg: invalid
Blumenthal, Uri wrote the following on 4/18/07 8:14 PM:
I have verified the e-mail (sent by Robert), twice: in the
original message from Robert, and in Robert's quoted message
in Uri's e-mail. Good signature.
That's a convincing proof.
The base 64 encoding of the signature is broken.
Blumenthal, Uri wrote the following on 4/18/07 8:14 PM:
I have verified the e-mail (sent by Robert), twice: in the
original message from Robert, and in Robert's quoted message
in Uri's e-mail. Good signature.
That's a convincing proof.
The base 64 encoding of the signature is broken.
Blumenthal, Uri wrote:
Interestingly, with GPGol both signatures verified correctly!
While attempts to use GPG4Win directly (open the email piece and
run GPG4Win on the Current Window) fail with BAD signature.
And GPG4Win crashes at the attempt to retrieve a key from the
remote keyserver
15 matches
Mail list logo
