On Wed, 4 Jan 2017 14:53, pe...@digitalbrains.com said:
> "Really sign all text user IDs? (y/N)"
> So how come that the jpeg image is about to be signed as well? What
> does "TEXT user ID" mean? I would have expected only the other UID's
> to be signed. Is this a bug in my head or in the code?
On 01/04/2017 03:00 PM, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> On 04/01/17 14:56, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>> What gives you the indication that the UAT is about to be signed?
>
> First and foremost, that it was actually signed when I agreed. I deleted the
> signature afterwards.
>
> Secondly, I just posted
On 04/01/17 14:56, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> What gives you the indication that the UAT is about to be signed?
First and foremost, that it was actually signed when I agreed. I deleted the
signature afterwards.
Secondly, I just posted again with a bit more readable text :-). You can clearly
(Ah, isn't that nice, Enigmail reformats the message when I do a signature.
Manually restored some sanity)
I'm signing keys after a keysigning party, using GnuPG 2.1.16. Issuing
--edit-key sign, I'm asked:
"Really sign all text user IDs? (y/N)"
Now here's what I see (anonymized):
> gpg (GnuPG)
On 01/04/2017 02:53 PM, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> So how come that the jpeg image is about to be signed as well? What does "TEXT
> user ID" mean? I would have expected only the other UID's to be signed. Is
> this
> a bug in my head or in the code?
What gives you the indication that the UAT is about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I'm signing keys after a keysigning party, using GnuPG 2.1.16. Issuing
- --edit-key sign, I'm asked:
"Really sign all text user IDs? (y/N)"
Now here's what I see (anonymized):
> gpg (GnuPG) 2.1.16; Copyright (C) 2016 Free Software Foundation,
