* Andrew Luke Nesbit:
> Enigmail and GPGTools are orthogonal components re: Thunderbird.
> Enigmail is something like the interface to the underlying GPG
> implementation.
Enigmail needs any one PGP/GPG binary. GPG Suite includes a binary that
is based on the official GnuPG sources. Other
On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 07:50, em...@andrewnesbit.org said:
> - Enigmail and GPGTools are orthogonal components re: Thunderbird.
> Enigmail is something like the interface to the underlying GPG
> implementation. In many cases on Mac OS X, including mine, this
> underlying implementation is indeed
Please excuse any previous attempt at posting this, which was sent
"From: " the wrong address.
On 07/11/2018 20:50, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> GPGTools has some problems in that they can't see the source for
Mail.app, and as a result they've sometimes been slower to patch things
than Enigmail.
> Does anyone have suggestions on the most secure and reviewed combination for
> bits for sending secure email on OSX?
None of the MacOS builds have received a formal audit. None.
The GnuPG codebase as a whole has received audits, but usually in a Linux
environment. I'm unaware of any
Hi Folks,
Does anyone have suggestions on the most secure and reviewed combination
for bits for sending secure email on OSX?
I noticed that there are two OSX packages for GPG:
Mac GPG Installer from the gpgtools project
GnuPG for OS X Installer for GnuPG
Is any one
