On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 19:41, patrick-mailingli...@whonix.org said:
Well, I don't speak C, so I can't make head or tail of what we do in
gpgme/src/verify.c.
You should still be able to follow the control flow. That is not
different from any pseudo code.
Is there a complete list of all possible
Werner Koch:
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 18:39, patrick-mailingli...@whonix.org said:
when using --verify combined with --status-fd [or --status-file], how
can one notice in scripts, that processing the one signature is done and
that further status-fd messages belong to the next message?
That is
Doug Barton:
On 3/19/15 10:39 AM, Patrick Schleizer wrote:
Hi,
when using --verify combined with --status-fd [or --status-file], how
can one notice in scripts, that processing the one signature is done and
that further status-fd messages belong to the next message?
You are using
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 18:39, patrick-mailingli...@whonix.org said:
when using --verify combined with --status-fd [or --status-file], how
can one notice in scripts, that processing the one signature is done and
that further status-fd messages belong to the next message?
That is unfortunately a
On 3/19/15 10:39 AM, Patrick Schleizer wrote:
Hi,
when using --verify combined with --status-fd [or --status-file], how
can one notice in scripts, that processing the one signature is done and
that further status-fd messages belong to the next message?
You are using --with-colons, right?
--
Hi,
when using --verify combined with --status-fd [or --status-file], how
can one notice in scripts, that processing the one signature is done and
that further status-fd messages belong to the next message?
I mean, sometimes it shows SIG_ID, but not in case of ERRSIG.
So is there some line /
by one key it works.
Is there a way how to sign file with multiple signatures by two commands
and to get the same OpenPgp binary format?
Other problem I've noticed when I signed file in non-batch mode is that
I’ve specified to use SHA512 for second signature.
Problem is that the 3rd octed of One-Pass
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:55, pje...@gmail.com said:
Other problem I've noticed when I signed file in non-batch mode is that
I’ve specified to use SHA512 for second signature.
You didn't. What you did is to specify an S2K hash algorithm which is
used to turn passphrases into keys. Further it is
Hi,
I want to sign binary data in OpenPGP Message Format.
I want sign it by two or more keys.
According to http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4880#section-5.4 it seems it is
possible.
(A one-octet number holding a flag showing whether the signature is
nested. A zero value indicates that the next
On Oct 3, 2011, at 1:49 PM, pet jemen wrote:
Hi,
I want to sign binary data in OpenPGP Message Format.
I want sign it by two or more keys.
According to http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4880#section-5.4 it seems it is
possible.
(A one-octet number holding a flag showing whether the
On 10/03/2011 14:39, Aaron Toponce wrote:
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 07:49:21PM +0200, pet jemen wrote:
I want to sign binary data in OpenPGP Message Format.
I want sign it by two or more keys.
According to http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4880#section-5.4 it seems it is
possible.
(A one-octet
when i have a set of OpenPGP signatures bundled together which have
different validities, it looks like gpg behaves differently depending on
if --batch is set or not.
In particular, an invalid signature seems to terminate the entire
--verify process (skipping later valid signatures) when --batch
, at 11:33 PM, Boris wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know if there is a way to add multiple signatures for a
file (in a separate file) and check who signed with just one command (so not
by signing a signed file...).
Sure.
gpg -u signer_1 -u signer_2 -u signer_3 --detach-sign file-to-sign
Thank you very much David
It is exactly what I wanted
2010/6/18 David Shaw ds...@jabberwocky.com
On Jun 17, 2010, at 11:33 PM, Boris wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know if there is a way to add multiple signatures for a
file (in a separate file) and check who signed with just one
On 6/18/10 3:39 PM, ved...@nym.hush.com wrote:
gpg --armor -u signer -u signer2 -u signer3 --clearsign filename
no.
6.5.8 and 6.5.8 ckt will crash only when trying to verify multiple
signatures of the same text when *clearsigned*.
Perhaps I'm in error here, but -- isn't a clearsign
Hi,
I would like to know if there is a way to add multiple signatures for a file
(in a separate file) and check who signed with just one command (so not by
signing a signed file...).
Thanks,
Koushkov
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
On 6/17/10 11:33 PM, Boris wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know if there is a way to add multiple signatures for a
file (in a separate file) and check who signed with just one command (so
not by signing a signed file...).
gpg --armor -u signer -u signer2 -u signer3 --clearsign filename
On Jun 17, 2010, at 11:33 PM, Boris wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know if there is a way to add multiple signatures for a file
(in a separate file) and check who signed with just one command (so not by
signing a signed file...).
Sure.
gpg -u signer_1 -u signer_2 -u signer_3 --detach
On Jun 17, 2010, at 11:33 PM, Boris wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know if there is a way to add multiple signatures for a
file (in a separate file) and check who signed with just one command (so
not by signing a signed file...).
Sure.
gpg -u signer_1 -u signer_2 -u signer_3
Robert J. Hansen rjh at sixdemonbag.org wrote on
Fri Jun 18 14:13:56 CEST 2010 :
I would like to know if there is a way to add multiple
signatures for a
file (in a separate file) and check who signed with just one
command (so
not by signing a signed file...).
gpg --armor -u signer -u
in the CVS
repository, potentially by multiple users, and I want to know if I can
store multiple signatures in a single binary string (I know that gpg
--verify can handle this) or if I need to keep them separate, to allow
for admins to later delete single, possibly expired, signatures from
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 11:52:08AM -0400, Derek Price wrote:
Say `gpg --detach-sign' were used to create several detached signatures
and they were concatenated into the same file. Is there a simple way to
separate those signatures again? Is there documentation of the gpg
signature file
David Shaw wrote:
Yes, and yes.
To separate signatures, use 'gpgsplit', which comes with gpg. You'll
end up with each signature in its own file.
The documentation of the signature file format is in RFC-2440:
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2440.txt
Thank you very much. That will be useful.
Alphax wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Berend Tober wrote:
Is it possible to have multiple persons sign a single file? If so, how
is this done?
The particular scenario is currently this: Employees submit expense
reports for business travel using a spread sheet.
Is it possible to have multiple persons sign a single file? If so, how
is this done?
The particular scenario is currently this: Employees submit expense
reports for business travel using a spread sheet. Current practise is
the the employee fills out spread sheet via computer (or optionally
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Berend Tober wrote:
Is it possible to have multiple persons sign a single file? If so, how
is this done?
The particular scenario is currently this: Employees submit expense
reports for business travel using a spread sheet. Current practise
26 matches
Mail list logo
