Joel Rees via Gnupg-users wrote:
Can I ask what new reason to make Stallman a scapegoat has emerged?
The recent round of attacks on Stallman seem to have begun after RMS
returned to the FSF Board. There is some controversy over the factual
basis for these attacks. (In other words, there
On 4/9/21 19:59, Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Hi!
>
> can we please stop this thread?
PLEASE! Thank you.
>
> This is a technical and privacy oriented mailing list and not a medium
> to discuss the pros and cons of a certain person. There are a enough
> other places for such chitchat.>
Hi Werner,
Am Fr den 9. Apr 2021 um 18:59 schrieb Werner Koch via Gnupg-users:
> can we please stop this thread?
>
> This is a technical and privacy oriented mailing list and not a medium
> to discuss the pros and cons of a certain person. There are a enough
> other places for such chitchat.
Hi!
can we please stop this thread?
This is a technical and privacy oriented mailing list and not a medium
to discuss the pros and cons of a certain person. There are a enough
other places for such chitchat.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein
Can I ask what new reason to make Stallman a scapegoat has emerged?
And why so many apparent core members of the gnupg community seem to be
joining the cancel culture?
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
The only thing that I can say is that I would rather see a FAQ that
reflect the current inplementation of GPG than a non-up to date FAQ per
lack of user consensus (1).
The problem there is without community buy-in, the FAQ lacks
credibility. It's supposed to be the *community's* FAQ, which is
On 4/8/2021 5:19 PM, Robert J. Hansen via Gnupg-users wrote:
If anyone in the community has strong feelings about the FAQ -- what
should go in, what should be left out, etc. -- now's the time.
The only thing that I can say is that I would rather see a FAQ that
reflect the current
The FAQ (https://www.gnupg.org/faq/gnupg-faq.html) claims the other
way round, namely:
Yep. Which was why I stepped away: I've ended my affiliations with FSF
and GNU. However, that FAQ was last overhauled in October 2017, and
apparently the relationship has changed in the last three and a
I'm just a user, but since this mailing list is called "users", and
for clairity:
>>Always has, hasn't it. I look at that for hm a long time, and it
always was like that.
The FAQ (https://www.gnupg.org/faq/gnupg-faq.html) claims the other
way round, namely:
>GnuPG is free cryptographic
This is solely my opinion. But i have to say it now.
Robert J. Hansen wrote in
<3e47e65a-790f-e323-7a0c-c14660cd2...@sixdemonbag.org>:
|A few weeks have passed, and I figured a recap might be appropriate:
|
| * FSF continues to support RMS
I have no opinion on that. I do not know him,
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 11:19, Robert J. Hansen said:
> Werner, are you still set on org-mode as the native format, or has
> Markdown+Pandoc matured enough to also be acceptable?
Yes, pretty please. The FAQ is part of the website which gets
automatically build from org-mode. However, if you want
11 matches
Mail list logo
