On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 20:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
point others to the signed patch. If any of the list owners have some
free time I'd be happy to try to get that corrected or take it to the
mailman-users list for advice if need be. (It seems that the content
filter settings for the list
On Dec 8, 2006, at 10:17 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Werner Koch wrote:
Basically I am the list owner :-(.
Good grief man, your head must hurt from all those hats. :)
His other name is Zaphod.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Hi!
Here comes a signed patch against 2.0.1 for those who care to verify
signatures ;-).
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
This is a patch against GnuPG 2.0.1. Change the directory to g10/ and
apply
Werner Koch wrote:
Here comes a signed patch against 2.0.1 for those who care to verify
signatures ;-).
Thanks Werner. Seems that the list archives scrub the attachment,
which makes it less useful than it'd be otherwise, 'cause you can't
point others to the signed patch. If any of the list
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 02:01:22PM -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Werner Koch wrote:
Here comes a signed patch against 2.0.1 for those who care to verify
signatures ;-).
Thanks Werner. Seems that the list archives scrub the attachment,
which makes it less useful than it'd be otherwise
