On Sun 2019-02-24 19:53:53 +, Farhan Khan via Gnupg-users wrote:
> I was under the impression that best practice was to keep the master
> key offline in cold storage.
"best practice" for some is "unusable complexity" for others :) If it
works for you, it's probably not unreasonable to keep
On 2/24/19 8:34 PM, Farhan Khan via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am still working on setting up the "perfect" setup. When I created the
> master, it was [SC]. I
> question, why is the signing key part of the master key? Why not have it be a
> subkey? Almost
&g
February 24, 2019 2:39 PM, "Kristian Fiskerstrand"
wrote:
> On 2/24/19 8:34 PM, Farhan Khan via Gnupg-users wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am still working on setting up the "perfect" setup. When I created the
>> master, it was [SC]. I
>>
On Sun, 2019-02-24 at 19:34 +, Farhan Khan via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am still working on setting up the "perfect" setup. When I created the
> master, it was [SC]. I
> question, why is the signing key part of the master key? Why not have it be a
> s
Hi all,
I am still working on setting up the "perfect" setup. When I created the
master, it was [SC]. I
question, why is the signing key part of the master key? Why not have it be a
subkey? Almost
everywhere I looked, the two were a single key except this site
(http://openpgpblog.
