Re: encrypt the sent folder - offline task

2006-12-08 Thread Cyrus Yunker
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 07:13:01PM +0200, Eray Aslan wrote: Hi, How can I make sure that all the emails in my Sent folder are encrypted and can't be read without my private key? In other words, I want my email in my Sent folder to be encrypted even though the email sent on the wire is plain

Re: encrypt the sent folder

2006-12-07 Thread Johan Wevers
Andrew Berg wrote: TrueCrypt works also on Linux (kernel 2.6.5 and up). The advantage is that a TC volume can be accessed on both Linux and windows - very usefull when I use the same USB stick both at home and on my work. Uhhh... TC requires admin rights in order to mount a virtual drive.

Re: encrypt the sent folder

2006-12-06 Thread John Clizbe
Todd Zullinger wrote: Eray Aslan wrote: Surely there must be a better way. These all require admin access to the IMAP server. The software already does what I want some of the time (when I send the recipient encrypted email). I just want it to do it all the time. This doesn't like an

Re: encrypt the sent folder

2006-12-06 Thread Eray Aslan
John Clizbe wrote: [snip] There is no provision for processing a message on multiple paths and specifying separate handling on each path when sending, nor would it be reasonable to expect there to be. Ahh, this is the problem. There are two RFEs filed in Bugzilla to allow the unencrypted

Re: encrypt the sent folder

2006-12-06 Thread Todd Zullinger
John Clizbe wrote: Sounds unreasonable to me. It's completely beyond our scope to implement. That seems more like not feasible than unreasonable. But the results are the same. :-) Thank you for the explanation. -- ToddOpenPGP - KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp

Re: encrypt the sent folder

2006-12-06 Thread Todd Zullinger
Eray Aslan wrote: I thought it was a mis-configuration on my part. Nope. As John pointed out this is simply not feasible to do from within Enigmail based on the way it has to interact with Thunderbird. If you don't trust the IMAP server admins, then you should store your mail somewhere you

Re: encrypt the sent folder

2006-12-06 Thread Robert J. Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Eray Aslan wrote: Please tell if there is an alternative. Your best alternative at this point is to hire a professional information security consultant. Your needs are highly specialized. That means that nobody here can give you good advice on

Re: encrypt the sent folder

2006-12-06 Thread Eray Aslan
Robert J. Hansen wrote: Your best alternative at this point is to hire a professional information security consultant. [snip] I'll fight for the budget but it's not likely. Thanks anyway. -- Eray signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: encrypt the sent folder

2006-12-06 Thread Eray Aslan
John Clizbe wrote: Eray Aslan wrote: The servers in question already have encryption at the file system level with cryptsetupLUKS for Linux and truecrypt for windows boxes. But the trouble is these do not provide any defense against attacks through the network. They will happily serve the

Re: encrypt the sent folder (Eray Aslan)

2006-12-06 Thread vedaal
On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 10:59:14 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Send Gnupg-users mailing list submissions to gnupg-users@gnupg.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users or, via email, send a message with subject

Re: encrypt the sent folder

2006-12-06 Thread Robert J. Hansen
Todd Zullinger wrote: That seems more like not feasible than unreasonable. But the results are the same. :-) Infeasible: we have the manpower, we have the tools, we have the talent, but the architecture is working against us in a big way. Unreasonable: our manpower is stretched so thin that

Re: encrypt the sent folder

2006-12-06 Thread Todd Zullinger
Robert J. Hansen wrote: Todd Zullinger wrote: That seems more like not feasible than unreasonable. But the results are the same. :-) Infeasible: we have the manpower, we have the tools, we have the talent, but the architecture is working against us in a big way. Unreasonable: our

encrypt the sent folder

2006-12-05 Thread Eray Aslan
Hi, How can I make sure that all the emails in my Sent folder are encrypted and can't be read without my private key? In other words, I want my email in my Sent folder to be encrypted even though the email sent on the wire is plain text. Encrypt to self option only works if I send an encrypted

Re: encrypt the sent folder

2006-12-05 Thread Robert J. Hansen
Eray Aslan wrote: How can I make sure that all the emails in my Sent folder are encrypted and can't be read without my private key? In other words, I want my email in my Sent folder to be encrypted even though the email sent on the wire is plain text. This is not a task for GnuPG. This is a

Re: encrypt the sent folder

2006-12-05 Thread Eray Aslan
On Tue, December 5, 2006 9:03 pm, Robert J. Hansen wrote: Eray Aslan wrote: How can I make sure that all the emails in my Sent folder are encrypted and can't be read without my private key? In other words, I want my email in my Sent folder to be encrypted even though the email sent on the

Re: encrypt the sent folder

2006-12-05 Thread Qed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On 05/12/06 20:03, Robert J. Hansen wrote: How can I make sure that all the emails in my Sent folder are encrypted and can't be read without my private key? In other words, I want my email in my Sent folder to be encrypted even though the

Re: encrypt the sent folder

2006-12-05 Thread Robert J. Hansen
Eray Aslan wrote: Surely there must be a better way. These all require admin access to the IMAP server. The software already does what I want some of the time (when I send the recipient encrypted email). I just want it to do it all the time. There isn't. If you want a program that does

Re: encrypt the sent folder

2006-12-05 Thread David Shaw
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 02:30:22PM -0600, Robert J. Hansen wrote: Also remember that OpenPGP is a wire protocol. The protocol is not meant for mass storage. Sure, you can use GnuPG to encrypt files, but once you start dealing with large numbers of them you're generally going to be better

Re: encrypt the sent folder

2006-12-05 Thread Robert J. Hansen
David Shaw wrote: I must disagree with this. OpenPGP is not solely a wire protocol. I probably should have said 'primarily'. It wasn't my intent to give the impression it was exclusively a wire protocol. The nice thing about using OpenPGP as an archival primitive is that each encrypted file

Re: encrypt the sent folder

2006-12-05 Thread David Shaw
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 02:52:56PM -0600, Robert J. Hansen wrote: David Shaw wrote: I must disagree with this. OpenPGP is not solely a wire protocol. I probably should have said 'primarily'. It wasn't my intent to give the impression it was exclusively a wire protocol. The nice thing

Re: encrypt the sent folder

2006-12-05 Thread Todd Zullinger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Eray Aslan wrote: Surely there must be a better way. These all require admin access to the IMAP server. The software already does what I want some of the time (when I send the recipient encrypted email). I just want it to do it all the time.

Re: encrypt the sent folder

2006-12-05 Thread Eray Aslan
Todd Zullinger wrote: Eray Aslan wrote: Surely there must be a better way. These all require admin access to the IMAP server. The software already does what I want some of the time (when I send the recipient encrypted email). I just want it to do it all the time. This doesn't like an