On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 23:57, benja...@py-soft.co.uk said:
Did alava...@gmail.com ever get removed? See
http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2010-May/038724.html
I can see no evidence that this address is abusing this ML.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 07:06, do...@dougbarton.us said:
Working on updating gnupg in FreeBSD and ran into a problem. GnuPG
2.0.15 requires libassuan 2.0.0, but to build the gpgsm module it
requires dirmngr, which requires libassuan 1.x. My understanding is
Oppps. I though I released a new
Hi,
I just released dirmngr 1.1.0 which requires libassuan 2.0.
Let me know if you have any problems,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
On 06/14/10 01:00, Werner Koch wrote:
Hi,
I just released dirmngr 1.1.0 which requires libassuan 2.0.
Let me know if you have any problems,
Looks good so far, thanks so much for the quick response! :)
Doug
--
... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
It's not me.
No problem.
Le vendredi 11 juin 2010 à 09:38 +0200, Werner Koch a écrit :
Hi!
One of the subscribers to this list created a mail forward to an
automated ticketing system which responds to the the poster. The
owner of the ticketing system at secure.mpcustomer.com does not
not me.
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 2:38 AM, Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org wrote:
Hi!
One of the subscribers to this list created a mail forward to an
automated ticketing system which responds to the the poster. The
owner of the ticketing system at secure.mpcustomer.com does not
respond to any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Monday 14 June 2010 at 6:19:58 PM, in
mid:4c1664be.1080...@fifthhorseman.net, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 06/14/2010 12:50 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
* discard all certifications which are larger than some
sorry, this thought
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Monday 14 June 2010 at 5:50:32 PM, in
mid:4c165dd8.5020...@fifthhorseman.net, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
Network or keyserver failures during an auto-refresh
should be accepted and the rest of the operation should
continue (though the
On 06/14/2010 07:54 PM, MFPA wrote:
On Monday 14 June 2010 at 6:19:58 PM, in
mid:4c1664be.1080...@fifthhorseman.net, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
The goal, again, is to avoid auto-refresh from chewing
up too much space on the local disk.
Although, of course, the certifications are all part of
