Hi all,
No body has an idea to reset a smartcard as factory settings ? I think it is
possible, but I don't know how to do that.
Thanks in advanced for your help.
Best Regard
- Mail Original -
De: tux tsndcb tux.tsn...@free.fr
À: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Envoyé: Dimanche 20 Septembre
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:13, marcio.barb...@gmail.com said:
Is this a generic asymmetric premise?
I mean: is it valid both to the (computational) Mathematics behind
OpenPGP's and X.509's public keys' integers?
Yes. All real world asymmetric algorithms are build on a hard so solve
computional
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 10:33, tux.tsn...@free.fr said:
No body has an idea to reset a smartcard as factory settings ? I think it
is possible, but I don't know how to do that.
If you have a version 2 card, this is possible.
WARNING: Don't run the commands given below on version 1 cards - you
Hi Werner,
Your help is a pleasure, thanks you very much, it works fine.
Best Regars.
- Mail Original -
De: Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org
À: tux tsndcb tux.tsn...@free.fr
Cc: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Envoyé: Vendredi 25 Septembre 2009 11h48:36 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin /
Berne / Rome /
On Sep 24, 2009, at 3:13 PM, M.B.Jr. wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 2:21 PM, David Shaw ds...@jabberwocky.com
wrote:
On Sep 24, 2009, at 12:30 PM, M.B.Jr. wrote:
Hi David,
about the first tidbit:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 6:08 PM, David Shaw
ds...@jabberwocky.com wrote:
First of all,
On 09/24/2009 04:56 PM, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
Does it also work with keys like 0xCB0D4CAF or 0xAB1BC4E6 created with
PGP 6 (or earlier) where the user ID is not UTF-8 encoded?
hm; 0xCB0D4CAF looks to me like it expired 5 years ago; and 0xAB1BC4E6
doesn't appear to be available on the public
On Sep 25, 2009, at 10:04 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
Since most of
these tools rely on gpg as a backend, implementing a more-reasonable
choice in gpg seems like a good idea.
What troubles me about this sort of behavior is that it is genuinely
good and helpful in some cases and baffling
Hi Werner,
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:19 AM, Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org wrote:
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:13, marcio.barb...@gmail.com said:
Is this a generic asymmetric premise?
I mean: is it valid both to the (computational) Mathematics behind
OpenPGP's and X.509's public keys' integers?
On Friday 25 September 2009, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 09/24/2009 04:56 PM, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
Does it also work with keys like 0xCB0D4CAF or 0xAB1BC4E6 created
with PGP 6 (or earlier) where the user ID is not UTF-8 encoded?
hm; 0xCB0D4CAF looks to me like it expired 5 years ago; and
On 09/25/2009 11:06 AM, David Shaw wrote:
What troubles me about this sort of behavior is that it is genuinely
good and helpful in some cases and baffling and off-putting in others.
For example, someone has two different Alice keys in their keyring.
Both keys have a single UID, which is
On Friday 25 September 2009, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 09/25/2009 11:06 AM, David Shaw wrote:
What troubles me about this sort of behavior is that it is
genuinely good and helpful in some cases and baffling and
off-putting in others. For example, someone has two different Alice
keys
On Sep 25, 2009, at 7:19 PM, nschroth wrote:
I have been reading previous posts on this topic but have not found my
answer.
When I ENcrypt on BoxA using -r UserName, decryption on BoxB errors
with :
decryption failed: secret key not available.
However, doing the same test using the email
Where can I find a manual for gpgme's API?
On gnupg's homepage, a reference manual is referenced, but there is no such
manual under Documentation - Manuals.
A search on Google only turns up a non-downloadable outdated version of the
manual for 1.1.6 on pyme.sourceforge.net.
I see in gpgme download
Hello sir,
I have a file that compressed in an .SEF format, I was wondering if you know
how to open an SEF file or maybe
you can direct me to someone who can ? It contains trading indicators
but without open source code they can't be used and I can't see the
source code without opening this
Hi all,
I need your help really urgent. I created a GPG key on a server with a
username. When i try to encrypt a file using that same key but using a
different NT user account it doesn't work.
How can I grant other users access to the key?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
All,
I'm trying to use gpg-1.4.9, and noticed an odd thing.
When a file that is empty is encrypted, decrypting it with --output
does not produce an empty file.. It produces NO file at all, and NO
system errors.
This is exceedingly odd - is this by design, and if so, why? It sure is a pain..
Ed
Hello,
I'd really appreciate if someone can provide feedback with a
decryption-related error we're getting.
For an encrypted file of size approx. 2 - 4 gigs, encrypted by a user
using the same key that is being used for decrypting it, there are
errors, as listed below - however there are
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Google Inc//Google Calendar 70.9054//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:REQUEST
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART:20090321T01Z
DTEND:20090321T02Z
DTSTAMP:20090922T181711Z
ORGANIZER;CN=Gordian Klein:mailto:gordian.kl...@googlemail.com
I am trying to upgrade to GPG2 and am having trouble, I think all stemming
from the new user agent feature. My first question: is there a way to simply
not use the user agent (i.e. just enter the passphrase as before) since it
does not seem to work in my environment? I tried using 'echo' and
Greetings gnupg-users,
I'm trying to seed gnupg-agent using the not-so-majikal
gpg-preset-passphrase tool. Emphasis on *trying* - it's not working atm
(yet?) All the gory details follow bellow, but in a nutshell, this is
what I think is happening:
* use of gpg-preset-passphrase results in a
20 matches
Mail list logo
