On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 15:03:53 -0500 Benjamin Donnachie benja...@py-
soft.co.uk wrote:
2010/1/8 ved...@hush.com:
At any rate, it seems disturbingly easy to distinguish between
symmetrically encrypted messages having only the word 'yes' or
'no'
just by 'looking' at the ciphertext.
i. Don't
On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 22:46:04 +0100, Bernhard wrote:
May I ask another question: Which gnome/kde program let me generate
smime keys?
You can't. What you can do is to create a certificate signing request
and send that to a CA to send you back a certificate. If you want a
GUI tool to create a
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 12:24:16 -0800 (PST), fava64 wrote:
Does this mean it doesn't work or does this mean that I did not understand
anything?
That probably means that your card does not follow the DIN V 66291-1
(aka DINSIG) as implemented by scdaemon.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
January 10th 2010 in gnupg-users@gnupg.org thread very short
plaintexts symmetrically encrypted
then there should be some sort of alert or advisory that the
plaintext should be a minimum length (whatever that minimum length or
alert/advisory should
I know what was wrong now: Ubuntu puts a use-agent line
in .gnupg/gpg.conf by default. I took it out and now the warnings are
gone. Thanks to Olav Seyfarth!
Kind regards,
Pepijn Schmitz
On vr, 2010-01-08 at 19:04 +0100, Pepijn Schmitz wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have a backup script which uses
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Robert J. Hansen escribió:
...
Crypto is not like this. Sure, you don't need to understand Feistel
networks or large number theory in order to use crypto, but look at what
you *do* need to understand:
* Identity verification
I think I
On 01/10/2010 10:57 PM, Faramir wrote:
* How hashes are misused and shouldn't be used
Ehh... I've never thought about it. How they should not be used?
I've seen computerized votes authenticated by MD5 hash... sent over
email... in the same message as the official vote record. As in, the
On 1/11/2010 1:26 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
I've seen computerized votes authenticated by MD5 hash... sent over
email... in the same message as the official vote record. As in, the
attachment has MD5 hash XXX, if your version hashes out to XXX then the
vote record is authenticated. I just
