Hi,
On 25.01.2010 13:41, Werner Koch wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:10, f.schw...@chili-radiology.com said:
Then you need to use finer grained debug control. Probably you need to
modify something in gpgme.
I updated to gpg 1.4.10 and gpgme 1.2.0 but this doesn't solve the problem.
I will put
Hey, I'm not sure if this is the right place to talk about this, but the
maintainer contact email listed in the Privacy Handbook is dead, the doc
mailing list has a last post in 2008, and it doesn't seem like it
belongs on the developer list. So...
There's no mention of --refresh-keys usage on
Hey, I'm not sure if this is the right place to talk about this, but the
maintainer contact email listed in the Privacy Handbook is dead, the doc
mailing list has a last post in 2008, and it doesn't seem like it
belongs on the developer list. So...
There's no mention of --refresh-keys usage on
Hi, is there a decision to use gpg on the same server and access it from remote
servers, such as a LAN or via the Internet? Thanks.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:48, f.schw...@chili-radiology.com said:
I'm getting a fd 256 which seams to be the maximum of fds gpgme can
handle. It might be some sort of design-issue in my software causing
so many open fds, but I'd still like to overcome this fd
Actually not, there is quite some
Hi,
I've have a OpenGPG smartcard version 2.0 and I would generate digests
stronger than SHA1.
I've added personal-digest-preferences SHA256 to my gpg.conf file,
but when I sign a message the headers still uses SHA1. If I force with
--digest-algo (which is not recommended according to the doc)
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:31, w...@gnupg.org said:
We need to change the datatructure.
Done. However we need to write a test case for it.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
___
Gnupg-users
