On 13/10/11 9:50 AM, Andy Bennett wrote:
Today someone suggested that they thought I'd revoked my key so I
looked into it. At first I thought that they were possibly correct:
some UIs seem to suggest that my key has indeed been
revoked. However, 'gpg --verify' and Enigmail are happy to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Saturday 15 October 2011 at 8:08:29 AM, in
mid:4e99316d.4050...@adversary.org, Ben McGinnes wrote:
That said, I can see why people might panic at the
sight of the key revocation message immediately after
the pub line instead of reading
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Friday 14 October 2011 at 9:15:48 AM, in
mid:201110141015.49420.mailinglis...@hauke-laging.de, Hauke Laging
wrote:
Right, thus I am thinking of naming it file.pdf.asc.txt
:-)
If that didn't trigger warnings about files with multiple
On 16/10/11 2:15 AM, MFPA wrote:
The key revocation message saying this key was revoked suggests it
to be referring to the key that was just listed rather than the one
that is about to be listed. Maybe something like the following key
was revoked might be a better wording if the message
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 02:58:27AM +1100, Ben McGinnes wrote:
On 16/10/11 2:15 AM, MFPA wrote:
The key revocation message saying this key was revoked suggests it
to be referring to the key that was just listed rather than the one
that is about to be listed. Maybe something like the
On 16/10/11 6:00 AM, Michel Messerschmidt wrote:
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 02:58:27AM +1100, Ben McGinnes wrote:
On 16/10/11 2:15 AM, MFPA wrote:
The key revocation message saying this key was revoked suggests it
to be referring to the key that was just listed rather than the one
that is about
