On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 10:49:19 +0200
NdK ndk.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all.
I'm planninng to start work on a OpenGPGCard TNG ( :) ) that allows:
- exportable keys only towards user-certified devices
- support for 2048 bit keys -- more if HW allows it
- storage for many (thought at least
Il 03/05/2013 09:53, Branko Majic ha scritto:
I'm planninng to start work on a OpenGPGCard TNG ( :) ) that
allows: - exportable keys only towards user-certified devices -
support for 2048 bit keys -- more if HW allows it - storage for
many (thought at least 18 to allow 1 key per year till
On Fri, 03 May 2013 10:18:12 +0200
NdK ndk.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
I can volunteer to test it out once you have some workable code - I
have a couple of Oberthur cards that are collecting the dust :)
How much memory do they have? I think that less than 64K won't be
enough... But you could
Hi,
Quoting Hauke Laging mailinglis...@hauke-laging.de:
how can I determine the key(s) for which a file has been encrypted
without gpg
trying to decrypt the file? I don't understand why --list-packets tries to
decrypt it anyway. --batch and --no-tty do not solve the problem.
Because of the
hi guys
i am just beginning using gpg/pgp, so my apologies in advance for my
confusions. i've read and tried several times to encrypt csv files with a
private-key, and to decrypt them back with public key.
actually, these different csv files should be encrypted by several
different users, and
Hi Werner
let's say, user_1 created public-private-key_1. then senders should encrypt
it with public-key_1 but for all user_1, user_2, etc.
with which private key will user_2, user_3,.. decrypt this file.csv, which
is encrypted with public-key_1?
thanks in advance
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at
On 05/03/2013 08:45 AM, Lema KB wrote:
SNIP
Werner is of course correct but since you need to do a send to
userid_1, userid_2, and userid_3 you will need the public key
for all three of the recipients. You need the public key for
each person you want to send a public key enciphered (encrypted)
On 05/03/13 12:58, Lema KB wrote:
Hi Werner
let's say, user_1 created public-private-key_1. then senders should
encrypt it with public-key_1 but for all user_1, user_2, etc.
with which private key will user_2, user_3,.. decrypt this file.csv,
which is encrypted with public-key_1?
No.
or can it be solved through binding PGP with Active Directory? How do i do
that, can you pls give any link?
thanks in advance
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Lema KB kibl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Werner
let's say, user_1 created public-private-key_1. then senders should
encrypt it with
It is not appropriate for us to have several public-private-keys.
Can GnuPG be downloaded on a virtual machine so, that, if one user on VM
generates a pair-key, this pair-key will be also the keys of other user of
this VM? So they all will be able to decrypt files using one private-key..?
How to
Il 03/05/2013 14:29, Lema KB ha scritto:
It is not appropriate for us to have several public-private-keys.
Then probably you don't need encryption at all. Or you only need
symmetric encryption (same key used both for enc and dec).
Can GnuPG be downloaded on a virtual machine so, that, if one
hi Diego
We need encryption, because the files are sent via Email from other
organisations. These files are then decrypted internally, that's why
all/several Win-Users of us.
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 2:51 PM, NdK ndk.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
Il 03/05/2013 14:29, Lema KB ha scritto:
It is
Il 03/05/2013 14:58, Lema KB ha scritto:
We need encryption, because the files are sent via Email from other
organisations. These files are then decrypted internally, that's why
all/several Win-Users of us.
Then you could setup a (different!) machine with a mail robot that
receives those
i've made this robot: it receives mail, decrypts files with my private-key,
and saves them in a folder. But, someone should click on run.. This is me
only. i need, that some others will be able to run it also. But it doesn't
decrypt files, as the priv-key for decryption is mine.
On Fri, May 3,
hi Henry
can a symmetric cipher be/use also public-private-keys?
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Henry Hertz Hobbit hhhob...@securemecca.net
wrote:
On 05/03/2013 08:45 AM, Lema KB wrote:
is it possible to do it in any other way, but using also priv-pub-key? i
am
like stuck..
Yes, I
On 05/03/13 15:02, Lema KB wrote:
can a symmetric cipher be/use also public-private-keys?
No. The whole point of public/private cryptography is to use asymmetric
ciphers.
(caveat: actually, this is an over-simplification. In reality, gpg DOES
use symmetric ciphers, but in a way that makes it
On Fri, 3 May 2013 14:29, kibl...@gmail.com said:
It is not appropriate for us to have several public-private-keys.
Although I don't consider this a good idea: You may give a copy of the
private key to all persons who need to decrypt the files. In general
such a group owned private key is not
Il 03/05/2013 15:44, Lema KB ha scritto:
i've made this robot: it receives mail, decrypts files with my
private-key, and saves them in a folder. But, someone should click on
run.. This is me only. i need, that some others will be able to run it
also. But it doesn't decrypt files, as the
Il 03/05/2013 14:51, NdK ha scritto:
Submission can be handled with a correct ACL (in *nix it could be
rwxrwx-wx on a folder: only members of the group will be able to read
the files in it, but every user can put his file there -- we used this
method for lab projects).
Just to be more
First, a restriction on who can access folder restricted to
just a group on 'nix should probably be:
drwxrwx--- (chmod 770 dir - all group members can write)
drwxr-x--- (chmod 750 dir - only owner can write)
http://www.securemecca.com/public/ChmodTable.txt
On OpenVMS you can and the
Pete Stephenson:
On 5/2/2013 8:06 PM, Abel Luck wrote:
Is it planned to support --delete-secret-keys?
Do existing versions not support --delete-secret-keys?
Oh, it must be not implemented in just 2.1 (git master). I just assumed
it wasn't implemented in 2.0 either. I wonder why it was
Hi All,
I am using Libgcrypt 1.5.2 with gcc v 4.5.3 on Cygwin to use the MPI functions.
Can you please provide some guidance on how to handle signed and negative MPIs?
I cannot seem to get a negative MPI, which is causing problems with other
computations (specifically gcry_mpi_invm never
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/03/2013 08:43 PM, Henry Hertz Hobbit wrote:
SNIP
First, I think public key encryption is apropos for what you
are doing if privacy is a concern. The way you approached
it without telling us you are on Windows until later on
indicates privacy
23 matches
Mail list logo
