On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 at 22:32:37 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> And what happens if you do gpg --import-options import-clean --recv-key
> ? is the bad MPI value sigs removed or still there in that case?
Should be `gpg --keyserver-options import-clean --recv-key $keyid`; or
alternatively,
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 23:16:55 +0200, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 at 22:32:37 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> > And what happens if you do gpg --import-options import-clean
> > --recv-key ? is the bad MPI value sigs removed or still there in
> > that case?
>
> Should be `gpg
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 22:52:13 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 09/22/2017 10:48 PM, Stefan Claas wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 22:32:37 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>
>
> >>> And in place of the fake sigs it says erroneous MPI value. :-)
> >>
> >> And what happens if you do
On 09/22/2017 10:48 PM, Stefan Claas wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 22:32:37 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>>> And in place of the fake sigs it says erroneous MPI value. :-)
>>
>> And what happens if you do gpg --import-options import-clean
>> --recv-key ? is the bad MPI value sigs removed
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 22:32:37 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 09/22/2017 10:29 PM, Stefan Claas wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 22:17:17 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> >> On 09/22/2017 10:08 PM, Stefan Claas wrote:
> >>> Thanks for the information! Can you tell me please how to
Hi,
I'm using gpg-agent with Yubikeys configured to require a physical touch
before performing operations. Is there any way to get gpg-agent to
display something on screen when it's waiting for me to touch the
Yubikey? (Otherwise, I sometimes don't realize it's waiting for
anything, and the
On 09/22/2017 10:29 PM, Stefan Claas wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 22:17:17 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>> On 09/22/2017 10:08 PM, Stefan Claas wrote:
>>> Thanks for the information! Can you tell me please how to import
>>> a pub key with a local client, so that invalid data get's removed
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 22:17:17 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 09/22/2017 10:08 PM, Stefan Claas wrote:
> > Thanks for the information! Can you tell me please how to import
> > a pub key with a local client, so that invalid data get's removed
> > automatically? When doing a gpg
it works with:
phablet@ubuntu-phablet-bq:~$ ./gpg2.sh --version
gpg-agent[28499]: enabled debug flags: mpi crypto memory cache memstat hashing
ipc
gpg-agent: a gpg-agent is already running - not starting a new one
gpg-agent: random usage: poolsize=600 mixed=0 polls=0/0 added=0/0
On 09/22/2017 10:08 PM, Stefan Claas wrote:
> Thanks for the information! Can you tell me please how to import
> a pub key with a local client, so that invalid data get's removed
> automatically? When doing a gpg --receive-key key-id the fake data
> is not removed.
What does gpg --check-sigs
On Thu 2017-09-21 23:47:14 +0100, MFPA wrote:
> Now that the upgrade path for GnuPG 2.0.x users is to 2.2.x versions,
> will be there any automatic conversion from keyring to keybox files,
> either offered by the installer or available as a command?
On debian systems, you can run:
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 21:40:41 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 09/22/2017 09:34 PM, Stefan Claas wrote:
> >>> O.k. i just tested a bit and this is a bug int the Web Interface
> >>> and in GnuPG's CLI Interface.
> >> I don't see a bug here.
> > Now i am a bit confused... Then maybe a
On 09/22/2017 09:40 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> So all is as it is supposed to be
Just to add, the alternative if not considering WoT is a direct
validation structure, a user in this case should only (locally) sign
keyblock information of communication peers after a direct fingerprint
On 09/22/2017 09:34 PM, Stefan Claas wrote:
>>> O.k. i just tested a bit and this is a bug int the Web Interface
>>> and in GnuPG's CLI Interface.
>> I don't see a bug here.
> Now i am a bit confused... Then maybe a "funny" design flaw? I mean
> what should users unfamiliar with the whole WoT
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 20:29:07 +0200, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 19:23, stefan.cl...@posteo.de said:
>
> > O.k. i just tested a bit and this is a bug int the Web Interface
> > and in GnuPG's CLI Interface.
>
> I don't see a bug here.
Now i am a bit confused... Then maybe a
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 19:23, stefan.cl...@posteo.de said:
> O.k. i just tested a bit and this is a bug int the Web Interface and in
> GnuPG's CLI Interface.
I don't see a bug here.
However, given that you use Posteo, you are in the good position to use
the Web Key Directory feature. This
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 17:24, g...@unixarea.de said:
> I instructed via gpg-agent.conf the gpg-agent to do a debug log which
> follows. The proc gpg-agent crashes with SIG_BUS.
That is why you see and EOF error from gpg.
We did a few more release after 2.1.19, which was released on March 1.
Not
On Thu, 21 Sep 2017 16:44:57 +0200, Stefan Claas wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> http://pgp.zdv.uni-mainz.de:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex=Erika+Mustermann
>
> Question for the experts, how can a casual or new GnuPG user, like
> Alice and Bob, detect a Signature forgery on a pub key, when using
> Web based
Hello,
I am Using gnupg on windows and want to use "Passphrase Callback" functionality
to input password for private key.
My current lines of code is:
error = gpgme_set_pinentry_mode(context,GPGME_PINENTRY_MODE_LOOPBACK);
gpgme_passphrase_cb_t func = _callback;
gpgme_pinentry_mode_t pinMode =
On 09/22/2017 11:55 AM, Jerry wrote:
> Can you cite the case #. All I could find is an old "local appeals court in
> Washington, D.C." ruling. I found nothing under the US Supreme Court.
See https://www.dccourts.gov/sites/default/files/2017-09/15-CF-322.pdf
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS
Hi, Jolla did an official port of SailfishOS to Sony Xperia X hardware.
It's about one year old, but you still can get one in Europe for around
300€.
Then you'll have to buy (49€) a Sailfish for Xperia license, and install
it. The only point is the the image is not yet available for purchase,
Am 22.09.2017 um 02:37 schrieb Ángel:
On 2017-09-21 at 23:37 +0200, Stefan Claas wrote:
Long ago when we had a discussion here on the Mailing List on
how to prevent unwanted signatures i made a proposal that
signing someone's public key should work similar to revocation
certificates. If you
22 matches
Mail list logo
