Re: Slightly OT - i need the proper wording for a signed document

2018-10-31 Thread Dirk Gottschalk via Gnupg-users
Hello Stefan. Am Mittwoch, den 31.10.2018, 18:59 +0100 schrieb Stefan Claas: > On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 18:53:33 +0100, Stefan Claas wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > i hope this is not to much off-topic... > > > > I recently signed up for the new Service of Germany's > > Bundesdruckerei*, to obtain a

Slightly OT - i need the proper wording for a signed document

2018-10-31 Thread Stefan Claas
Hi all, i hope this is not to much off-topic... I recently signed up for the new Service of Germany's Bundesdruckerei*, to obtain a *qualified* X.509 Certificate, which is complaint with the EU's eIDAS regulation. Because PGP signatures are not qualified, nor the pub keys, i thought to create a

Re: Slightly OT - i need the proper wording for a signed document

2018-10-31 Thread Stefan Claas
On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 18:53:33 +0100, Stefan Claas wrote: > Hi all, > > i hope this is not to much off-topic... > > I recently signed up for the new Service of Germany's > Bundesdruckerei*, to obtain a *qualified* X.509 Certificate, > which is complaint with the EU's eIDAS regulation. Oh... sorry

Re: File name seen by gpg

2018-10-31 Thread Werner Koch
On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 01:33, alvaro@gmail.com said: > It seems I was not looking at the right keywords when I searched, because I > couldn't find that option before. Note that the filename stored with the encrypted or signed data is not even convered by the signature. Thus it is possible to

gpg troubles

2018-10-31 Thread Roland Siemons (P)
Thanks Friedhelm, That is a lot to think about. I'll study .. Best regards, Roland On 31/10/2018 01:33, gnupg-users-requ...@gnupg.org wrote: > Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 04:18:31 +0100 > From: Friedhelm Waitzmann > To: gnupg-users@gnupg.org > Subject: Re: gpg troubles > Message-ID: