Hi veedal,
On Thu, 01 Nov 2018 15:20:33 -0400, vedaal via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 01.11.2018, 17:42 +0100 schrieb Stefan Claas:
> > On Thu, 01 Nov 2018 16:09:56 +0100, Dirk Gottschalk wrote:
>
>
>
> > That is the reason why i like to sign the .pdf, containing my key
> >
Am Donnerstag, den 01.11.2018, 17:42 +0100 schrieb Stefan Claas:
> On Thu, 01 Nov 2018 16:09:56 +0100, Dirk Gottschalk wrote:
> That is the reason why i like to sign the .pdf, containing my key
> data, with a qualified eIDAS conform signature. The detached GnuPG
> sig should be an
On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 20:14:19 +0100, Wiktor Kwapisiewicz wrote:
> On 01.11.2018 11:19, stefan.cl...@posteo.de wrote:
> > And this is the problem i have since 1994/95... For me signatures
> > made with PGP / GnuPG have no weight, for several reasons, except
> > those made from Governikus and maybe CT
On 01.11.2018 11:19, stefan.cl...@posteo.de wrote:
> And this is the problem i have since 1994/95... For me signatures
> made with PGP / GnuPG have no weight, for several reasons, except
> those made from Governikus and maybe CT Magazine signed keys.
I, for one, like the OpenPGP's approach of
On 1 Nov 2018, at 18:32, Dirk Gottschalk via Gnupg-users
wrote:
>
> Oh, you have also this issue? IO read about it in a Facebook group.
> Libreoffice is complaining about a bad signature with Zertificates from
> D-Trust even after importing the root. When you have the same problem,
> they seem
On Thu, 01 Nov 2018 19:23:04 +0100, Dirk Gottschalk via Gnupg-users
wrote:
Hi Dirk,
> Am Donnerstag, den 01.11.2018, 18:49 +0100 schrieb Stefan Claas:
> > On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 17:42:41 +0100, Stefan Claas wrote:
>
> > I am also *very much* interested what infos users in the U.S.,
> > Canada,
>
Hi Stefan.
Am Donnerstag, den 01.11.2018, 18:49 +0100 schrieb Stefan Claas:
> On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 17:42:41 +0100, Stefan Claas wrote:
> I am also *very much* interested what infos users in the U.S.,
> Canada,
> U.K. and Ireland, for example, see (is the certificate Info displayed
> in
> English?)
On Thu, 01 Nov 2018 18:32:58 +0100, Dirk Gottschalk wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 01.11.2018, 17:42 +0100 schrieb Stefan Claas:
> > I am not able to verify a qualified eIDAS conform X.509 sig, which
> > i can create now, with LibreOffice, nor with other tools, except
> > Adobe Reader DC or with the
On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 17:42:41 +0100, Stefan Claas wrote:
> > > Here is a little example, of a .pdf i have signed with my
> > > qualified signature:
> > >
> > > https://keybase.pub/stefan_claas/docs/greetings.pdf
> >
> > > Linux users can verify my qualified signature here:
> >
On Thu, 01 Nov 2018 16:09:56 +0100, Dirk Gottschalk wrote:
Hi Dirk,
> Am Donnerstag, den 01.11.2018, 11:19 +0100 schrieb
> stefan.cl...@posteo.de:
> > Hi Dirk,
> > I personally like that we have such EU regulation. And i understand
> > that it costs money to build and maintain such
hi Stefan.
Am Donnerstag, den 01.11.2018, 11:19 +0100 schrieb
stefan.cl...@posteo.de:
> Hi Dirk,
> > To answer your question, even if the answer is not what you
> > expected:
> I expected something like this... ;-)
>
> > I don't think this would change anything on the reputation on your
> >
Hi Dirk,
To answer your question, even if the answer is not what you expected:
I expected something like this... ;-)
I don't think this would change anything on the reputation on your key.
I even don't think there is any good reason for the EU-Regulation at
all. There is much taste of "get
12 matches
Mail list logo
