> On 10 Nov 2018, at 00:57, Dirk Gottschalk via Gnupg-users
> wrote:
>
> I suggest using a Cron job, or a SystemD timer and service to do a
> refresh on a regular base.
I’ve found parcimonie to be useful.
https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/code/parcimonie/
Hello Stefan.
Am Samstag, den 10.11.2018, 00:41 +0100 schrieb Stefan Claas:
> Thanks too, Dirk,
> i already made a refresh.
Yeah, I read it right after I sent my Email.
I suggest using a Cron job, or a SystemD timer and service to do a
refresh on a regular base.
Regards,
Dirk
--
Dirk
On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 00:00:18 +0100, Dirk Gottschalk wrote:
> Hi Stefan.
>
> Am Freitag, den 09.11.2018, 16:18 +0100 schrieb Stefan Claas:
> > On Fri, 9 Nov 2018 16:12:19 +0100, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > I get a valid signature but key has expired message, when
> > reading your
Hi Stefan.
Am Freitag, den 09.11.2018, 16:18 +0100 schrieb Stefan Claas:
> On Fri, 9 Nov 2018 16:12:19 +0100, Peter Lebbing wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> I get a valid signature but key has expired message, when
> reading your posting.
>
> Regards
> Stefan
Peters key is valid. Probably you have to
Hello,
One of my notebooks running apparently fails to refresh keys from key
servers for so long time.
- it is running the latest gpg4win bundle (3.1.4);
- there is no firewall preventing gpg's connection to the key server;
- it just says: refreshing keys from hkps:// and hangs for like
10 - 15
On Fri, 9 Nov 2018 16:40:18 +0100, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> On 09/11/2018 16:18, Stefan Claas wrote:
> > I get a valid signature but key has expired message, when
> > reading your posting.
>
> In that case you should refresh your copy of my public key from the
> keyservers or from the URL in my
Hi,
On Fri, 09 Nov 2018 at 16:12:19 +0100, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> On 07/10/2018 03:01, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> Does this make sense? you just need to make sure you tie the version of
>> gpg and the keyring into the same initramfs build time.
>
> The problem is that the gpg invocation is
Hmmm, normally Thunderbird will snip off the (was: ...) portion of a
Subject:-line on replies, but this thread persisted in having it in and
has just gotten an insane Subject:-line by my doing. Sorry for the messy
Subject:-line, I didn't notice until now.
Peter.
--
I use the GNU Privacy Guard
On 09/11/2018 16:18, Stefan Claas wrote:
> I get a valid signature but key has expired message, when
> reading your posting.
In that case you should refresh your copy of my public key from the
keyservers or from the URL in my signature:
$ gpg --refresh-keys pe...@digitalbrains.com
or
$ gpg
On Fri, 9 Nov 2018 16:12:19 +0100, Peter Lebbing wrote:
[snip]
I get a valid signature but key has expired message, when
reading your posting.
Regards
Stefan
--
https://www.behance.net/futagoza
https://keybase.io/stefan_claas
pgpjJrfGjd4Uh.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
On Fri, 09 Nov 2018 09:22:13 +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 18:34, stefan.cl...@posteo.de said:
>
> > apartment and accidentally threw away the box
> > in which the revocation cert was stored... :-(
>
> :-(
>
> > How would you procede now?
>
> Fetch your backup which for
Daniel, many thanks for thinking about this! I'm sorry I didn't respond
earlier.
On 07/10/2018 03:01, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Does this make sense? you just need to make sure you tie the version of
> gpg and the keyring into the same initramfs build time.
The problem is that the gpg
On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 18:34, stefan.cl...@posteo.de said:
> apartment and accidentally threw away the box
> in which the revocation cert was stored... :-(
:-(
> How would you procede now?
Fetch your backup which for you will have stored at a different
venue .-)
Call the locksmith to open the
13 matches
Mail list logo
