Re: WoT question - policy

On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:40:11 +0100, Dirk Gottschalk wrote: Hi Dirk, > Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2018, 23:41 +0100 schrieb Stefan Claas: > > You make a very important point, which i thought also about and > > that is my little approach for covering my a*#. I would strongly > > assume that law

Re: WoT question - policy

Hi. Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2018, 23:41 +0100 schrieb Stefan Claas: > On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 22:54:01 +0100, Dirk Gottschalk wrote: > Hi Dirk, > > Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2018, 21:05 +0100 schrieb Stefan Claas: > > > I disagree, with my humble approach imho third parties do not > > > know > > >

Re: WoT question - policy

On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 22:54:01 +0100, Dirk Gottschalk wrote: Hi Dirk, > Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2018, 21:05 +0100 schrieb Stefan Claas: > > I disagree, with my humble approach imho third parties do not know > > that people are my real friends, colleagues, or that i belong to a > > certain

Re: WoT question - policy

On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 21:35:47 +, MFPA wrote: > On Thursday 15 November 2018 at 8:05:05 PM, in > , Stefan Claas wrote:- > > > > I am no expert, but i like to know from my example > > (because i don't > > understand this) how could i trust this internal > > computation, when it > > is only

Re: WoT question - policy

Hello Stefan. Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2018, 21:05 +0100 schrieb Stefan Claas: > On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 20:15:21 +0100, Dirk Gottschalk via Gnupg-users > wrote: > > > > When i first learned about PGP in 94/95 i also thought why should > > > people sign each other's key for a WoT and why do we need

Re: Exporting/ importing changes expiration date of subkeys...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi On Thursday 15 November 2018 at 10:57:19 AM, in , gnupgpacker wrote:- > Indeed, but better link: > https://www.gpg4win.org/links.html Better in that it works. Worse in that it is longer. (-; - -- Best regards MFPA

Re: WoT question - policy

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi On Thursday 15 November 2018 at 8:05:05 PM, in , Stefan Claas wrote:- > I am no expert, but i like to know from my example > (because i don't > understand this) how could i trust this internal > computation, when it > is only visible to me

Re: WoT question - policy

On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 20:15:21 +0100, Dirk Gottschalk via Gnupg-users wrote: Hi, > > When i first learned about PGP in 94/95 i also thought why should > > people sign each other's key for a WoT and why do we need a global > > WoT and what is it good for. > > This should be obvious. Please

Re: WoT question - policy

Hi. Am Dienstag, den 13.11.2018, 22:36 +0100 schrieb Stefan Claas: > On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 21:39:18 +0100, Wiktor Kwapisiewicz wrote: > > On 13.11.2018 17:54, Stefan Claas wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > i thought about creating a key certification policy, for my key, > > > and like to know your

Re: WoT question - policy

On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 11:05:06 +0100, Stefan Claas wrote: > On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 17:54:08 +0100, Stefan Claas wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > i thought about creating a key certification policy, for my key, > > and like to know your opinions. > > > > > > >