he OpenPGP spec should have a way to do
> this.
My point was "there is already a way to do this: use signature
notations". Is that a red herring?
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
Don't talk unless you can improve on th
ed to support TOFU
> so these messages might not be shown.
I would think that was quite important, for users whose email client
uses GPGME.
--
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
A pict
s cause for concern. Maybe there is a good reason this check is not
currently done. The fact that information is available and *could* be
used does not mean it necessarily *should* be used.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
Penguins are
use of throw-keyids or hidden-recipient or hidden-encrypt-to. And if
another copy were encrypted separately, we know nothing about it.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
Wise men learn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Friday 6 November 2015 at 3:46:21 PM, in
<mid:20151106154621.b1bd620...@smtp.hushmail.com>, ved...@nym.hush.com
wrote:
> On 11/6/2015 at 10:11 AM, "MFPA" wrote: While writing
> in the "TOFU for GnuP
-does-not-have-one>
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
Look, it's a hat! It's not going to hurt you.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJWJWbiXxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRCM0FFN
ion's network.
The IT people never had any answers if asked about email security.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
What's another word for synonym?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQF8BAEB
multiple User-IDs to a single key-pair.
- --
Best regards
MFPA mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net
He's an environmentalist - his arguments are 100% recycled
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJV32BMXxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
, the parent secret key can be
calculated. So the parent key and all possible child keys are
compromised by the compromise of just one child secret key.
- --
Best regards
MFPA mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net
Don't learn safety rules by accident...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
and posting histories did not become merged.
> If at least one of you commit crimes with
> your signed messages, you will share the same legal
> liability unless proved not guilty by other means,
What happened to being innocent until proven guilty?
- --
Best regards
MFPA
it.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
My mind works like lightning... one brilliant flash and it's gone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJWD7foXxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Saturday 3 October 2015 at 1:04:55 PM, in
igure out which of us was using the certificate.
This may not be the case if the crime took place in a jurisdiction
that applies the doctrine of joint enterprise [0].
[0] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_purpose>
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-
options
> --tofu-default-policy and --tofu-db-format.
Should these be available in the Windows version? I get:-
gpg: unknown trust model 'tofu+pgp'
gpg: unknown TOFU policy 'ask'
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
Change is
ur public key in his
> computer would be a problem.
I suggested he delete my key and re-import it. He tells me he tried
that twice and it didn't help. It's a mystery to me.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
The man who really want
The reason for the missing Tofu support is that we need
> to package Sqlite in a way to make it easy to
> cross-compile for Windows. It is just a bit of work
> but other things have higher priority for now than
> Windows.
Thanks for the explanation.
- --
Best regards
MFPA
/windows/misc/gnupg-w32-2.1.10_20151204.tar.gz/gnupg-w32-2.1.10/PLAY/src/libgpg-error/doc/errorref.txt>
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
Why is the universe here? Well, where else would it be?
--
them back
round to see what happens.
> (1) Different error message "The signature can't be
> checked - End of file."
--
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
To steal ideas from one person is plagia
unknown pubkey algorithm" for the signature from my
EDDSA subkey.
> There's also one
> other difference; The signature is no longer inline,
> but attached. Not that I expect that is relevant.
Yes, I accidentally used PGP/MIME instead of inline.
- --
Best regards
MFPA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Thursday 2 June 2016 at 3:43:10 AM, in
<mid:138546192.20160602034...@riseup.net>, MFPA wrote:
> Thanks for replying. Port 11371 is not blocked:-
[snipped]
Sorry. I just spotted the reason in "[Announce] GnuPG 2
, ZIP, ZLIB, BZIP2
Thank you.
I have passed on both replies.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
It's better to feed one cat than many mice
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJXVMN/XxSAAC4AKGlzc3V
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Friday 3 June 2016 at 12:33:17 PM, in
<mid:211459920.20160603123...@riseup.net>, MFPA wrote:
> [snipped]
Please ignore me. I've realised the version 2.1.12 release
announcement tells me the Windows installer is missing HKP
ure to the recipient as Good,
or not.
This was before Christmas, so maybe the Enigmail people fixed it in the
meantime.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
Roses smell better than onions but don't make such
e lines appear and the task exits:-
gpg: no keyserver known (use option --keyserver)
gpg: keyserver search failed: No keyserver available
Subsequent attempts to run
gpg -v --keyserver hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net --search-keys mfpa
display the "no keyserver known" message with no freezing,
n).
[0]
<http://ftp.rrzn.uni-hannover.de/pub/mirror/linux/opensuse/repositories/security:/privacy/openSUSE_13.2/i586/>
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
All generalisations are dangerous, even this one.
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Saturday 4 June 2016 at 11:15:36 AM, in
<mid:ba3bd322-022f-4d24-4784-42c69de34...@sumptuouscapital.com>,
Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 06/04/2016 12:10 PM, MFPA wrote:
>> I recently created a new Curve 25519 encryption
st timed out.
513 ms12 ms12 ms be10-1194.gra-g2-a9.fr.eu [2001:41d0::292]
6 *** Request timed out.
7 *** Request timed out.
820 ms20 ms20 ms po6.vss-4-6k.routers.ovh.net [2001:41d0::522]
920 ms20 ms20 ms 2001:41d0:2:a8b4::10
41.243.15:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 44ms, Maximum = 45ms, Average = 44ms
Any ideas how to proceed?
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
Alcohol a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Wednesday 1 June 2016 at 1:34:15 PM, in
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
You can't build a reputation on what you are going to do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJXbXlLXxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRCM0FFN0VDQTlBOEM4Q
inst by switching from hexadecimal to, for
example, base 32. Preferably in one of the variants that precludes
visual clashes, such as O0 Z2 I1l B8 b6 S5.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
ETHERNET(n): device used to catch the Ether bu
is works in Powershell, not in an ordinary Command window. The
syntax is:-
Get-FileHash FileToHash.ext -Algorithm sha1
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
Wait. You think I'm right?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQF8BAEB
have faced.
I sometimes see people try to hijack threads without top-posting. I
spent a few minutes trying to find examples, but could not come up
with good-enough search terms.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
No man ever listened
email.
Please not (B), or it will appear as a new thread. (Unless you meant
reply to the previous message without quoting from it.)
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
Keep them dry and don't f
our messages, I suggest checking
your subscription options at
<https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users>. You might have
the option to receive a copy of your own posts turned off.
--
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
I would
second guide to export the
subkeys to an OpenPGP smartcard.
[0] <https://wiki.debian.org/GnuPG/AirgappedMasterKey>
[1] <https://wiki.debian.org/GnuPG/SmartcardSubkeys>
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
Alw
e
> primary key and the
> first subkey.
Just enter the same passphrase as already used for this key when
prompted for the passphrase for the new subkey.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
Dreams come true on this side of the
of it is needed. If "the
authorities" think they need access to some specific group or
individual's communications, they can employ plain old-fashioned
deception to have undercover agents worm their way in and get
themselves trusted and included in the encryption list.
he
> assumption that
> one always want to use the newer key, not the oldest
> one.)
That would enable a "denial of service" attack: I publish a key
containing your email address in a UID, people encrypt to my newer key
instead of your older key.
- --
Best regards
MFPA
r example to begin with a help ticket
number or simply to make the subject match the content?
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
My mind works like lightning... one brilliant flash and it's gone
-BEGI
ithout any other text
> around it. Dashes are
> there so that misleading spacing cannot be
> canonicalised away. Subject
> lines wouldn't ever be changed and expected to
> remain valid, because the
> process would be "Send a blank email with the
> subject line
> "VALID
shouldn't?
> Checking the subject line seems fairly reasonable,
> and requiring an
> email in response to one the CA---In-Reply-To is
> signed in my test
> messages, you can use a signature as the message
> ID---ought to make
> things more difficult for anyone but the CA.
I
size to vary (usually to a bizarre key size that
> would be quite suspect, and not believed).
Is that why the majority of keys are exactly 1024, 2048, etc. bits, or
is there a technical reason?
--
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
War i
G is not version 2.1.x
will not see report of a valid signature.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
The trouble with words is that you never know whose mouths they've been
subkeys, etc. to a key that is
already on the server. But you cannot delete anything from it.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
No matter what a man's past may have been, his future is spotless.
-B
nouncement saying this has
changed.
[0] <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2015-October/054608.html>
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
Something must be done. This is something. Therefore, we must do it.
--
your keyring.
Does exporting local signatures make it somehow more likely they might
be accidentally sent to a keyserver?
And if they are accidentally sent to a keyserver, does the keyserver
strip them because they are marked as non-exportable?
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:
.
Windows binaries for GnuPG versions 2.1.x and 1.4.x are the second and
third items listed at <https://gnupg.org/download/index.html#sec-1-2>.
The first list item points you to the GPG4win download page.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@r
chanisms). These new modular locking
mechanics allowed the locks to be serviced and rekeyed
because all components could be removed and reconstructed."
[0] <http://united-locksmith.net/blog/the-history-of-padlocks>
- --
Best regards
MFPA &l
ages, her
advert was 100% of her message content.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
A picture is a poem without words
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJXwtiVXxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAb
can only be opened from the outside with a
key."
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
Coffee doesn't need a menu, it needs a cup.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iL4EARYKAGYFAlfwCClfFIAALgAoaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbn
how as "GnuPG's OpenPGP Tool".)
Not sure why you get .pgp files; I get .asc.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
Lotto: A tax on people who are bad at statistics!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQF
use this app" box ticked if you are unsure.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
The greatest of faults is to be conscious of none.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iL4EARYKAGYFAlfv9gxfFIAALgAoaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl
bnBncC5maW
;https://www.confidantmail.org>? Maybe your signing/encryption servers
at each end could incorporate a CM-to-SMTP gateway; CM could be
awesome it were possible to compose and read messages on an ordinary
mail client.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-g
> front-end and the readme file says it can be run only from
> command-line.
That's as it should be. Well done.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
Don't cry because it is over - smile because it happened
ure what component in the package is a beta; GnuPG 2.1.15
isn't and most of the version numbers match those in Gpg4win version
2.3.3 (2016-08-18).
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
After all is said and done, a lot more will be said t
do the same sort of search:
>
> gpg.conf-1.4.18
> gpg.conf-1.4
> gpg.conf-1
> gpg.conf
[0] <https://www.mail-archive.com/gnupg-users@gnupg.org/msg26542.html>
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro.
the bottom of this page:-
https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=0x2B9880E1E6602099=vindex
Can anybody explain?
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
Two rights do not make a wrong. They make an airplane.
-BEG
cipients to mean "try this/these key(s)
and if they won't decrypt it, give up on hidden recipients".
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
Only dead fish go with the flow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATU
llegedly signed at that specific
> date or (prior to a
> determined date).
Maybe use a digital timestamping service, such as
<http://www.itconsult.co.uk/stamper/stampinf.htm>?
Or publish an encrypted (or not) copy in the small ads of a newspaper.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <ma
s out
they do not like the URL you will now get as the first search result
on the search URL I have substituted above.)
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
No matter where you go, there you are.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iL4EARYKAGY
y by its key ID with an appended
> '!',
The --export-secret-subkeys command will do what it says on the tin.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
A fool and his money are soon partying
w.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-
d...@lists.debian.org/msg1499869.html>
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
Something must be done. This is something. Therefore, we must do it.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQ
oblem went away when I switched back to GnuPG 2.1.19.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
Keep them dry and don't feed them after midnight
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iNUEARYKAH0WIQQzrO1O6RNO695qhQYXErxG
ogroups.com> or
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pgpnet/>.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
During an eruption - move away from the volcano - not towards it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iNUEARYKAH0WIQQzrO1O6RNO695q
signatures.
For what its worth, forcing SHA-256 signatures with a "digest-algo"
line in gpg.conf doesn't cause anybody to shout that there is a
problem. But GnuPG says "gpg: WARNING: forcing digest algorithm
SHA512 (10) violates recipient preferences".
- --
Best regards
MFPA
1EF251BFAB has been revoked
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
It's not hard to meet expenses, they're everywhere.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iNUEARYKAH0WIQQzrO1O6RNO695qhQYXErxGGvd
pins like 1234 or
> their birthday).
Surely things like 1234 can be prevented by software.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
Change is inevitable except from a vending machine
facility. And
at one time, NatWest only allowed a PIN change the first time the card
was used in one of their own ATMs.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
A woman's mind is cleaner than a man's: She changes it more often.
-BEGI
he UK bank card PINs are almost exclusively 4 digits long. The
bank allocates a PIN initially, but the customer can usually change it
as often as they like at an ATM that supports PIN changes.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
Hard wor
some countries, using your Dutch
> bank card, if you
> allow it), the PIN necessarily went to the bank,
> there was no way for a
> check by the chip in the card.
Same applies with online shopping.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.ne
odern
> cryptography are at hand. Think of asymmetric methods
> like RSA ...
All of which is irrelevant for online transactions. On the shopping
website, the customer keys in the long card number, the PIN, and the
last three digits from the signature strip. The chip on the c
or example, see
<http://personal.natwest.com/personal/ccet/service/debit-card0.html>
and
<https://www.barclays.co.uk/help/cards/pin/forgot-pin/#main>.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
I would like to help you out. Which wa
the long card number, the **expiry date** and the last three
digits from the signature strip. The chip on the card is not involved.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
If you are afraid to speak against tyranny, then you are already a sl
would think you could transfer the private key file to the moblle
device by bluetooth, or by using a USB cable, or by email. So long as
the private key is protected by a decent passphrase, anybody else
getting a copy of the file should be of no consequence.
- --
Best regards
MFPA
for
> everyone, not just old
> people.
Have you considered using a password manager to remember them?
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
Can you imagine a world with no hypothetical situation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Thursday 27 July 2017 at 10:46:33 AM, in
<mid:e74cc71a-5049-403b-32e0-ba9f0fe3f...@digitalbrains.com>, Peter
Lebbing wrote:-
> On 27/07/17 11:24, MFPA wrote:
>> Have you considered using a password manager to
>> remembe
nPGP, it's just there for additional
> purposes with other
> applications.
At least on some, NFC works with OpenPGP. For example, see
<https://www.grepular.com/An_NFC_PGP_SmartCard_For_Android>.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
No
s usually a good idea. That's the whole
> point of the
> OpenPGP smartcard, after all.
Do "most normal users" make use of an OpenPGP smartcard? Those that do
might be able to use the same keypair on their mobile phone by means
of an NFC-enabled smartcard.
- --
Best regards
ve the capacity.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
If you save the world too often, it begins to expect it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iNUEARYKAH0WIQQzrO1O6RNO695qhQYXErxGGvd45AU
ash). Otherwise they would not know
if you entered the correct PIN for online transactions.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
War is a matter of vital importance to the State.
---
all" does not reply to the list,
It does here. I normally just use "Reply", same as other lists.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
Wise men learn many things fro
verify without any errors the text that appeared on my timeline.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iNUEARYKAH0WIQQzrO1O6RNO
ze of my tofu.db from 1532 to 1432 KB but unfortunately GnuPG
still reports the same issue.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
Beware the deadly donkey falling slowly from the sky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATU
4 KB but GnuPG
unfortunately still reports the same issue.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
Day-old pastry is hollow succour to a man who is bereft of ostrich.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iNUEARYKAH0WIQQzrO1O6RNO695qhQYXErxGGvd45AUC
roblem key and to a revoked key from the
same user, deleted the signature and encryption entries relating to
those bindings, then restored from the dump file. I don't know what
issues this may introduce but I no longer get the "TOFU db corruption
detected" messages.
- --
Best regards
MFPA
,
> hopefully refresh the key (or complain or abandon
> PGP), and get both
> the revocation certificates and the new subkeys.
> Without even having
> to understand what happens.
Doesn't "auto-key-retrieve" in their gpg.conf take care of this?
- --
Best regards
MFPA
ill read or generate
QR codes, so people don't need to jump through too many hoops to read
the message.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
It is not necessary to have enemies if you go out of your way
keyring does contain
an image, which I can view by
gpg --list-options show-photos --list-keys Fingerptint.
How do I "rebuild" the TOFU database to get rid of the corruption?
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
Amateu
emoved the flag from the
> primary key.
I didn't know you could remove a usage flag once the key was on the
keyservers. And I thought GnuPG would automatically sign with a valid
signing subkey if there was one.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@r
lid signature
> "Good". I think it
> suggests they both have some credibility, which is a
> false suggestion.
I thought "good signature" just meant the message has not been
altered in transit.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-
Or maybe that the original
message data has been replaced with new message data that hashes to
the same value.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
Keep them dry and don't feed
ese messages on this list lately. It looks like
somebody has subscribed a customer helpline email address
<supp...@koramgame.mail.helpshift.com> to the list.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
I would like to help you out. Which way did
, I find I have to stick with 2.1.19 because of
<https://dev.gnupg.org/T3097>.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
Only dead fish go with the flow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iNUEARYKAH0WIQQzrO1O6RNO695qhQYXErxGG
u
have joined an email to <pgpnet-traditio...@yahoogroups.com> removes
this silliness.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
Another person's secret is like another person's money:
you are not as careful with it as y
version to locate a key from the local keyring or from
keyservers. A member of PGPNET produced some Python scripts as an
exercise in seeing what might go into this, when we last discussed the
idea over there about three years ago.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3d
th his/her id-card so that it's guaranteed that
> Alice is not Eve.
Assuming the users trust both the CA and the entity that issued the
id-card.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
Two rights do not make a wrong. They make an airplan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sunday 30 April 2017 at 7:34:40 PM, in
<mid:6b5b17cd-95bc-836c-6dd2-ea2473d84...@digitalbrains.com>, Peter
Lebbing wrote:-
> I think keys 1, 2 and 3 are all subkeys; NOT your
> primary.
Isn't the primary "key 0"?
-
solved by renaming my old pubring.kbx
file and importing all the keys from it into GnuPG, thereby generating
a new pubring.kbx. At least, 2.1.21 seems to work for me at the
moment.
- --
Best regards
MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
Look, it's a hat!
airphone <https://www.fairphone.com> tries, but they still
have proprietary hardware drivers. "Made using conflict-free
minerals."
Too dear for me (529 euros from Fairphone themselves, 465 GBP new or
385 GBP refurbished from <https://www.thephone.coop>.
- --
Best regards
MFPA
701 - 800 of 875 matches
Mail list logo
