On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 08:04, rica...@martinet.de said:
Windows 7 would be nice. But Linux would also OK.
Write a system service / daemon, wait for changes in the directory and
then call gpg (best via gpgme) to encrypt the file. Or do it with a
simple script controlled by a cron job (under Unix).
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 09:13, bra...@majic.rs said:
Hm... Under GNU/Linux there's ecryptfs, but I'm not sure if it's
capable of using a GPG key for decrypting the symmetric key? It
GnuPG-2.1-beta comes with the g13 tool which uses an OpenPGP or X.509
key as the encfs key. encfs is just one
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 23:08, yanaty...@yahoo.com said:
I need to automate the porcess of receiving an decrypting files encrypted
with a gpg key.
Since this is supposed to be an unattended process I need to preset a
passphrase.
It would be easier and equally save not to protect the key at
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:29, pe...@digitalbrains.com said:
myself, and I've seen it mentioned by others on this mailing list. At least on
*nix, it's relatively common that options can come in any position of the
arguments.
That is not a general Unix feature but a GNU feature.
Werner, perhaps
On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 11:55, pe...@digitalbrains.com said:
Why is --armor dropped when it is not wanted as a filename?
Sorry, I don't understand you. There is just a note telling the novice
that --armor is not an option.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 11:56, peter.c.dietr...@freenet.de said:
I use gpg on Windows XP Sp3 via gpg4win 2.1.1-svn1694.
I don't know this version. The last released one is 2.1.0. Meanwhile
we switched to git and thus the svn prefix does not make sense anymore.
Please test with the 2.1.0.
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:14, da...@gbenet.com said:
I'm using Mint Linux - gpg2 and gpg are both using /.gpg I have no /.gpg2 dir
on my system
Are you sure? The default home directory is ~/.gnupg and not ~/.gpg .
It is not advisable to have different directories for both versions.
We took
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:04, da...@gbenet.com said:
I have done as you have suggested. It is to be noted that whenever I
install a new Linux disro I always run gpg --version - Linux Mint does
not create ~/.gnupg automatically one has
I did a quick test by adding a new user on a pretty standard
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 06:49, quanngu...@mbm.vn said:
I'm using GnuPG and OpenSC to test my token. Each time I've done using
GPG, the OpenSC cannot access the token. I have to reboot the computer
to use OpenSC.
GnuPG requires exclusive access to the card. The best way to work with
the card from
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 04:08, papill...@gmail.com said:
This is a stupid question I'm sure but I can't seem to find an answer
to it in the source code so I thought I'd ask here. When GnuPG is
Tou need to look into Libgcrypt. From its manual:
The generation of random prime numbers is based on
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 12:06, edm...@systemli.org said:
Hello, I am facing problems decrypting data with my OpenPGP v2 card.
Signing however is working just fine. I have collected the following
output. The PIN retry counter looks a bit weird, could that be the problem?
The 3 0 3 are just fine.
On Wed, 2 May 2012 20:40, mika.henrik.mai...@hotmail.com said:
GPG4Win works on Windows 7 too. http://gpg4win.org/
Except for the explorer extension gpgex, which does not work with the 64
bit explorer. We are planning an update, though.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei.
On Thu, 3 May 2012 10:12, papill...@gmail.com said:
Quick question: are there any security concerns with running GnuPG and
GPG4Win on the same system?
Gpg4win is an installer which includes GnuPG as its crypto engine. In
fact, Gpg4win is the suggested way to install GnuPG on Windows.
In case
On Thu, 3 May 2012 10:57, papill...@gmail.com said:
Thank you, Werner. The system already has GPG installed and they
won't want a second copy, I'm sure. I thought GPG4Win added a new
context menu item that would allow easier file encryption. If not then
Right. However, you can select which
On Thu, 3 May 2012 17:19, scra...@carrollu.edu said:
installation. However, I am getting the error below when attempting to
do the make install step (as SU), which seems to indicate that the
This might be a timestamp/make problem. If you don't care about i18n
you may simply do
./configure
On Thu, 3 May 2012 20:45, da...@gbenet.com said:
and the following commands in my gpg.conf file produce error messages when I
remove the hash (#)
# --pgp2
Don't use the two dashes in the config file. They are only needed on
the command line.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken
On Thu, 3 May 2012 23:15, da...@gbenet.com said:
A re-think of valid user options are required by the developers I think :)
I suggest that you use GPA or Kleopatra to modify the options. To a
large extend they make sure that the options are correct (via gpgconf).
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
On Fri, 4 May 2012 00:27, h...@qbs.com.pl said:
decision, and that's agreed by basically anybody (NIST, ECRYPT II).
Especially
when the cost of establishing the link with 8k RSA is insignificant for any
session over 5min in length (as is common in SSH).
Sorry, but that is plain nonsense.
On Fri, 4 May 2012 03:03, j...@enigmail.net said:
I suspect WK has ECC ready to go in both GnuPG 1.4 and 2.0 as soon as the ID
is approved. I know it's already present in the 2.1 beta code.
No, we don't plan to port it back to 1.4. It will actually take years
until ECC keys are in wide use
On Fri, 4 May 2012 12:07, h...@qbs.com.pl said:
It still doesn't change the overall picture:
1. migrating to ECC is hard and complicated
Right, it will take years. But that is not a problem.
2. using 8k RSA is easy
I already told my opinion on this.
That was written in 2003, nearly 10
On Fri, 4 May 2012 16:59, do...@dougbarton.us said:
I hope you reconsider backporting ECC to 1.4. Given some of the changes
It would be a lot of work and I doubt that we can find anyone to finance
that. In fact, finding financial support for any kind of work on GnuPG
is very hard.
you've
On Fri, 4 May 2012 14:53, mw...@iupui.edu said:
Let me turn things around. Other than providing opportunities to
discuss the practicalities of large RSA keys, is there any reason why
the agent should care what size key it is storing?
The OpenPGP parser has a limit on the size of the MPI
On Fri, 4 May 2012 16:17, gn...@oneiroi.net said:
I think I should give Werner much faster phone now ;) (on my own using
8192-bit RSA key takes about 2-4 seconds to successfully auth; phone was
2 seconds are way too long. I look at most mails not even for a second;
if I need to wait 2
On Fri, 4 May 2012 20:54, a...@lown.me.uk said:
Might I point out that discussion is with respect to an 8k RSA SSH key
for SSH authentication, not for email. A 2 second delay during the
initialization of an SSH connection is not a problem.
The delay with SSH would even be longer. Again, it
On Fri, 4 May 2012 21:47, do...@dougbarton.us said:
only use 1.4 as a result already. The thing that will kill 2.1 for me is
the removal of the multiple public keyring functionality.
Frankly I doubt that we will be able to remove the latter for 2.1 ;-).
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die
On Sat, 5 May 2012 20:27, gn...@oneiroi.net said:
Hm, shouldn't authentication happen before exchanging key for
symmetric part of encryption during the SSH session?
No, DH is commonly (and by SSH) used as a key agreement protocol. This
means that N and only N communication peers agree on a
On Sat, 5 May 2012 00:38, d...@fifthhorseman.net said:
Any ideas what's going on here? Am i wrong to try to use --batch in
this instance?
It would be useful to add --status-fd 2, so that you can see what gpg
actually expects as user/batch input.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken
On Sun, 6 May 2012 22:29, dgbale...@0x01b.net said:
Is this supported? Am I going to have the same problems if I change the
No. You don't need it.
However, GnuPG 2.1 kind of supports this because it drops the secring
entirely and thus there is no more need trying to keep pubring and
secring
On Sun, 6 May 2012 20:15, pe...@digitalbrains.com said:
I suppose it was thought that exporting a private key was such a
relatively rarely used command it did not need to be among the most
It is also possible that I did not list it with --help so that the user
is required to read the full
On Sat, 5 May 2012 12:08, pe...@digitalbrains.com said:
Why should the GnuPG authors include a feature they don't believe in? If
it's in GnuPG official, it will need to be supported. What if there is
It is marketing again. PGP started to use AES-256 for marketing reasons
and thus we more or
On Mon, 7 May 2012 16:31, d...@fifthhorseman.net said:
I don't see anything in the --status-fd output that gives me more of a
clue, unfortunately.
I need to debug it later this evening.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
On Mon, 7 May 2012 18:54, rychi...@yahoo.com said:
It gives below error. Why it is looking in 'C:/Documents and
Settings/Default User/Application'? Can someone help on this?
Because that is the correct directory as told by your Windows version
(by means of CSIDL_APPDATA) or configured by you:
Hi,
the problem you have is that you mix commands on the command line and
those from stdin. If you replace
$ printf 10w\nsave\n | gpg --batch --passphrase-fd 3 \
--command-fd 0 --status-fd=2 --edit-key t...@example.org expire 3pw
by
$ printf expire\n10w\nsave\n | gpg --batch
On Tue, 8 May 2012 00:08, rychi...@yahoo.com said:
gpg: keyblock resource `DIR/secring.gpg': No such file or directory
gpg: keyblock resource `DIR/temporary': No such file or directory
gpg: keyblock resource `DIR/pubring.gpg': No such file or directory
I suggest that you import the keys
Hi!
We are pleased to announce the first tarball release of the
New GNU Portable Threads Library: nPth version 0.90.
nPth is a non-preemptive threads implementation using an API very similar
to the one known from GNU Pth. It has been designed as a replacement of
GNU Pth for non-ancient
On Tue, 8 May 2012 16:41, r...@sixdemonbag.org said:
Symmetric encryption uses one key and only one key.
In theory this is correct. However, OpenPGP uses a random session key
and that key is in turn encrypted symmetrically. The protocol allows to
mix arbitrary numbers of public and symmetric
On Wed, 9 May 2012 22:15, guy...@lechiennoir.net said:
It seems that I can't write the certificate to the smartcard.
Is it a bug or did I made a mistake? BTW, I get the same error on Fedora 16..
I don't know. I only implemented it once and never used. There is no
need for it in GnuPG. To
On Thu, 10 May 2012 13:29, si...@josefsson.org said:
I thought OpenPGP cards didn't support storing X.509 certs?
There was some spare space on the new chips and thus the specs allow for
an optional field to store a certificate (or any other data) . GnuPG 1.4
does not support it.
On Mon, 14 May 2012 18:05, avi.w...@gmail.com said:
In one of the recent, longer, threads, it was my understanding
that Werner said that the 1.4.x branch of GnuPG will not be
updated to have ECC capabilities, and may eventually be put
into runoff as it were. Werner, may I request that you
On Mon, 14 May 2012 23:53, avi.w...@gmail.com said:
anything to work, as I am not able to figure out how to us gpgconf to
switch sysconfdir to my stick's drive, and everything else is failing
The directory is determined by looking at CSIDL_COMMON_APPDATA. It
seems you can change the value by
On Tue, 15 May 2012 16:50, avi.w...@gmail.com said:
them temporarily each time if necessary. Allowing an option to have
the home and other helper directories configured as a subfolder of the
install directory on the install should be helpful as well. What I
I agree. We could do this. If a
On Tue, 22 May 2012 10:58, tim.kac...@gmail.com said:
on my computers than break the keys, however they can't plant spyware on
everone's computer. without people noticing They do slurp up and
Are you sure? Did you looked at the GnuPG code so closely to come up
with such a strong statement?
On Tue, 22 May 2012 20:40, r...@sixdemonbag.org said:
I think so, yes. The question is who's going to write it? I suspect
Werner doesn't have the time. If he wants, I would be happy to take a
stab at writing it.
Please go ahead. Plain text optionally with org-mode formatting.
On Tue, 22 May 2012 17:29, avi.w...@gmail.com said:
That would be great! To close the loop, could the installer be
modified to ask if the current install is portable and then create
that file before the rest of the install to make it seamless?
I am not keen to add yet another visible option.
On Tue, 22 May 2012 21:28, steveb...@gulli.com said:
If any of the GnuPG wizards like to chime in on the technical side on the bug
tracker we're happy about any input.
AFAIK a Mac specific PINentry is used and not the GTK+ or QT version.
Thus I can't help.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die
On Wed, 23 May 2012 11:30, mika.henrik.mai...@hotmail.com said:
I cannot verify your signature, because you use PGP/MIME and this
mailing list uses mailing list software which somehow messes up with
headers and makes PGP/MIME signatures unverifiable.
It is this old Mailman/Python illness. I
On Wed, 23 May 2012 15:24, r...@sixdemonbag.org said:
You may want to move this discussion over to the Enigmail list. We have
a system set up that does much of this already, called Adele. We'd be
Is that a different one than the Adele from Gnu_PP_, which is a closed
source web service?
On Wed, 23 May 2012 17:35, mika.henrik.mai...@hotmail.com said:
On 23.05.2012 12:56, Steve wrote:
I think we had the PGP/MIME vs inline discussion already.
I am using PGP/MIME in this email. Can you verify my signature on this
email? You can find link to my public key in my signature.
Sure:
On Wed, 23 May 2012 23:40, ds...@jabberwocky.com said:
Excellent. One note on the new text - it states that 2048-bit DSA
keys use a 224-bit hash. In fact, a 2048-bit DSA key can use either
224 or 256-bit hashes. GnuPG uses 256 here (but will of course accept
For the records: Before 2.0.13,
On Wed, 23 May 2012 18:17, da...@gbenet.com said:
I've had your key for ages - so why not attach it?
Sorry, I don't understand. You want my key? Look into the OpenPGP mail
header or simply use a keyserver.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein
On Thu, 24 May 2012 01:03, mailinglis...@hauke-laging.de said:
That sounds like there has never been a security problem. El-Gamal
signatures,
anyone?
Right, there was a bug in the Elgamal signature code. However this was
a regression long after we changed the default to DSA with version
On Thu, 24 May 2012 13:13, rychi...@yahoo.com said:
I want to opt out from emails. I don't see unsubscribe option. How can I opt
out?
Have a look at the last line of each mail:
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Or look into the mail headers.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
On Thu, 24 May 2012 14:04, tanguy.herrm...@gmail.com said:
But for example, I don't know how to display only the fingerprint of a key
without all the display around that I must grep/cut/sed away. But maybe I
$ gpg --fingerprint --with-colons 1e42b367 | awk -F: '$1==fpr {print $10}'
Hi David,
your mails are hard to read because you do not trim the quotes and use
lines of 90 characters or longer. Please don't use more than about 72.
One hint anyway:
GNOME has a thing called gnome-keyring which hijacks the gpg-agent IPC
and thus you run into problems when using GnuPG-2. It
On Thu, 24 May 2012 19:09, gonzale...@hildebrando.com said:
but when I use this, the gpg send me a message:
I can't see that but I guess that you want to use this command line:
gpg --armor --output enc.txt --encrypt --recipient secur...@gooddata.com
--trust-model always --batch --yes
On Thu, 24 May 2012 02:22, r...@sixdemonbag.org said:
The final version that gets submitted to Werner will by necessity be
plain text, and that will probably get downshifted into dumb typewriter
Keep those quotes. I like UTF-8 and it is always easier to replace them
by ticks and backticks
[expires: 2018-12-31]
uid Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org
sub 1024D/77F95F95 2011-11-02
sub 2048R/C193565B 2011-11-07 [expires: 2013-12-31]
1E42B367 is the primary key and thus has the fingerprint which is
usually communicated. C193565B is the encryption key you see
On Fri, 25 May 2012 15:31, mw...@iupui.edu said:
And life is too short to go trawling the Internet for X Compose
sequences. If I could find a comprehensive table I'd probably use
Meanwhile I set my keyboard to:
| mod3+ | normal | shift |
|---++|
| P | „ |
On Tue, 29 May 2012 15:15, anots...@fastmail.fm said:
I want to post a public key in a blog and sign the blog entry. The
problem is, that - gets converted to - -. The reader can't copy
and paste the public key, he has to remove the - first.
If you process the signature with GPG, it
On Tue, 29 May 2012 15:45, lefevre...@osu.edu said:
$ gpg --decrypt sensitive_file.gpg
gpg: encrypted with ELG-E key, ID F1940956
gpg: decryption failed: secret key not available
Use
gpg --keyid-format long --decrypt sensitive_file.gpg
to see the non-abbreviated key ID as stored in the
On Tue, 29 May 2012 18:31, r...@sixdemonbag.org said:
Honestly, this seems like something to bring up to the IETF WG. The RFC
already has a plethora of implementation recommendations: adding an
implementation recommendation of use long key IDs when possible seems
I bet that this will
Hi,
I can't remember whether I announced it, but since some weeks
keys.gnupg.net is a CNAME to pool.sks-keyservers.net
and
http-keys.gnupg.net is a CNAME to ha.pool.sks-keyservers.net
The reason for this change is that it is useless to spend a lot of work
in maintaining such a second
On Tue, 29 May 2012 19:44, r...@sixdemonbag.org said:
Anyway. If people are interested in what I found out about effective
user-interface design with respect to certificate managers, say the
word. Otherwise I'll crawl back under my rock and leave the subject
GPA has many different ways to
On Tue, 29 May 2012 19:54, lefevre...@osu.edu said:
This is, not surprisingly, the case. There was bad logic in my script
and somehow, somewhere, it's using the wrong key for this particular
Speaking of scripts: Scripts should use --with-colons and never try to
parse the regular output.
On Tue, 29 May 2012 22:02, mailinglis...@hauke-laging.de said:
You are probably running gpg non-interactively. In order not to break
scripts
it is strongly encouraged to use scripted output of gpg only with the options
--with-colons, --batch and --status-fd. See http://www.gnupg.org/...;
On Wed, 30 May 2012 10:50, r...@sixdemonbag.org said:
for a bit. If anyone has any advice, I'll be coming back to this
problem tomorrow. Maybe letting it sit for a while will spur my brain
into solving it.
The sudo gpg2 might indicate that root has a running gpg-agent and
thus scdaemon.
On Wed, 30 May 2012 11:47, quanngu...@mbm.vn said:
I tried to make the log, but both the file S.log and mycombinedlog are
empty.
Did I wrong somewhere?
Did you restart gpg-agent?
pkill gpg-agent
and check with ps that it has really been killed. You should see a
notice in the log as
On Wed, 30 May 2012 16:16, r...@sixdemonbag.org said:
On 05/30/2012 09:40 AM, Mark H. Wood wrote:
Oh, how many times have I wondered why GPA has no search tool.
Taking a look at GPA, it seems that 0.9.0 no longer compiles on a modern
UNIX -- it expects libassuan-1.x, apparently, and
The new download site is
ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/gpa/
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On Wed, 30 May 2012 14:54, r...@sixdemonbag.org said:
Also, should this be socket://home... or socket:///home...?
Oops, 3 dashes are correct.
Starting over from scratch again I manually removed S.gpg-agent and
S.log. S.gpg-agent was recreated automatically, but S.log seemed to not be.
On Wed, 30 May 2012 16:54, r...@sixdemonbag.org said:
http://www.gnupg.org/related_software/gpa/
then, as it points off at a site which only offers 0.9.0 for download. :)
That makes sense. For most other parts of GnuPG we enter the current
version number into a file swdb.wml and are
On Wed, 30 May 2012 21:42, expires2...@rocketmail.com said:
And shared the fact privately with Symantec?
I heard that it is just a bug introduced by the marketing suits. The
PGP library never dropped support for DSA2.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt
On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 05:29, r...@sixdemonbag.org said:
This is vexing. Time to look at it again in the morning.
I hate udev debugging. The udev rules are too hard to maintain.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
On Thu, 31 May 2012 21:28, r...@sixdemonbag.org said:
Other people will chime in with precise folder paths. I no longer have
access to any Windows XP machines, so I can't -- but a little
exploration should reveal them.
Run
gpgconf --list-dirs
It shows a list of all directories in the
On Thu, 31 May 2012 23:04, raubvo...@gmail.com said:
According to http://www.gnupg.org/gph/en/manual.html#AEN153,
Clearsigned documents do not seem to have a -END PGP SIGNED
MESSAGE- tag. And yet there is a -END PGP MESSAGE- tag
for messages encrypted with gnupg. Am I missing
On Thu, 31 May 2012 17:30, guy...@lechiennoir.net said:
gpg2 --card-status
gpg: can't connect to the agent - trying fall back
gpg2 starts a new agent. You may want to correctly install gpg-agent -
see the manual or the man page.
gpg: OpenPGP card not available: No SmartCard daemon
but
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 17:39, mli...@robin-kipp.net said:
2012-06-02 15:46:48 scdaemon[6044] pcsc_transmit failed: not transacted
(0x80100016)
What reader are you using? It is possible that your reader does not
support extended length APDUs, which are required for v2 cards.
Shalom-Salam,
On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 23:50, i...@euemd.info said:
please can someone explain when the context menu command Import OpenPGP
Key (on an attached key) is active or inactive (grayed out)? I cannot
You mean in the Windows file explorer extension GpgEX? IIRC, it works
solely by matching on the file
On Sun, 3 Jun 2012 20:17, ventur...@gmail.com said:
By disabling the insternal driver I was able to able to generate keys
up to 3072 bits on my v2 card using a SCM-335 card reader via
pcsclite.
That is a different problem than that with the Omnikey reader. In your
case the permissions of
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 10:49, b...@adversary.org said:
Was there any explanation of why the marketing people dropped or
wanted to drop the functionality?
Maybe outdated technical specs which made it to the marketing dept. I
don't know - you need to ask Symantec.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 18:35, lists.gn...@mephisto.fastmail.net said:
require extensive manual configuration for it to work properly (but if
you're using Mutt, you already know that). See
http://wiki.mutt.org/?MuttGuide/UseGPG for configuration details.
That is not true: Put
set
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 19:11, b...@adversary.org said:
Fair enough. Most people I correspond with use GPG, I'll worry about
it if I ever have trouble with someone encrypting to my El-Gamal key.
Not for a compliant OpenPGP implemenations. From RFC-4880:
Implementations MUST implement DSA for
Hi,
IMHO (Open)PGP's good repudiation comes to great extend from the fact,
that it does not require rigor policies to use the keys. It is an
ad-hoc scheme and that is what differences it from S/MIME and PKIX.
It was my fault that I once set the no-modify flag for all new keys. In
practice this
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 13:24, r...@sixdemonbag.org said:
text and layout. If anyone has recommendations about this, please speak
up now. With luck, we can have this thing to Werner by the end of the
Some time ago I added custom ids to most questions; for example:
** What is the recommended
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 15:24, lists.gn...@mephisto.fastmail.net said:
I don't know if this is a coincidence or not, but I will mention that
for the first time in a long while, Mutt segfaulted when I tried to
open a message on the gnupg mailing list... presumably when it tried
I see two reasons
Author: Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org
Date: Wed Dec 14 10:30:01 2011 +0100
scd: Fix resetting and closing of the reader.
* scd/command.c (update_card_removed): Do no act on an invalid VRDR.
(do_reset): Ignore apdu_reset error codes for no and inactive card.
Close
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 18:43, m...@spoked.ca said:
Somehow, gpg2 is not able to read the key from the card. Is this a
known bug? I have not found anyone else documenting this.
I don't have a crypto stick, thus I can't test it.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 22:26, kloec...@kde.org said:
Supports GnuPG versions: 1.4, 2.0
FWIW: Kontact Touch has been developed against GnuPG 2.1. I am not sure
whether it works with 2.0. The Linux version will likely work but the
WindowsCE version won't work - but well, nobody is using the
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 19:22, r...@sixdemonbag.org said:
I can add these: it shouldn't be a problem. The reason I'm using XHTML,
incidentally, is to make it as easy as possible for you to convert it
into org-mode: an hour's work with a SAX parser should be able to take
care of most of it. If I
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012 21:54, pe...@digitalbrains.com said:
But it's a bit unclear to me on what basis you decided it looked correct? Your
mail suggests to me that you decided that based on the fact that the UID on
that key is Werner Koch (dist sig). But that would be the very first thing
On Thu, 7 Jun 2012 17:59, mika.henrik.mai...@hotmail.com said:
% gpg --list-sigs D8692123C4065DEA5E0F3AB5249B39D24F25E3B6
pub 2048R/4F25E3B6 2011-01-12 [expires: 2019-12-31]
uid Werner Koch (dist sig)
sig 58DFC608 2011-06-11 Andrey ...
sig 30B94B5C 2012
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012 23:41, smick...@hotmail.com said:
Another thing is that downloading the key from that link you provided
is no guarantee of safety in and of itself either because the page is
not being hosted over SSL with confirmed identity information. So
That is not relevant. The key
On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 18:35, jw72...@verizon.net said:
When I installed Gpg4win, it came with GnuPG v2.0.17. I am not sure
when it will be updated to include v2.0.19, but I was wondering
The new beta has 2.0.19.
whether there would be any problem from substituting the new version
of gpgv2.exe
On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 11:28, markr-gn...@signal100.com said:
Do you know of any common modern browsers that have finger protocol
support built in? I wonder, how many people even have a finger client
Indeed they must have dropped finger recently. I don't known when I
checked the last time, but
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 16:03, smick...@hotmail.com said:
I wasn't going to say anything, but I had no idea what Mr. Koch was
talking about with that finger stuff. I studied his email and the
email header looking for clues. Couldn't decipher what he meant.
I am sorry about this. Most of the time
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 16:36, smick...@hotmail.com said:
Mr. Koch, can you (or anyone else) recommend a book that is good for
novices like myself that covers GPG public keys and can help me learn
how to verify identity based on the chain of trust (self-signatures
and other signatures as you said
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 19:48, r...@sixdemonbag.org said:
We already have something similar to this in --auto-key-retrieve, and
the same warnings about that option probably also apply here. The
principal difference would seem to be that auto-key-retrieve only
fetches certificates that are not on
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 19:09, r...@sixdemonbag.org said:
proprietary programs, but saying proprietary program X does Y and the
FOSS alternative doesn't, I really like Y, I'd like it if we could do
Y is just fine.
Right.
Note that the FSF actually forbids us maintainers to mention proprietary
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 04:08, avi.w...@gmail.com said:
GPA does not allow me to edit gpg.conf; then again, the system seems
Sure it does. You may edit most of the options:
Edit-Backed_Preferences. This uses gpgme to edit the conf files in a
reliable way.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:01, avi.w...@gmail.com said:
shows. But where do I address options such as s2k-digest-algo and
bzip2-compress-level? How do I change the Home directory (it's using
You are not supposed to change these options :-). We include in the
GUI only those options which are
501 - 600 of 3671 matches
Mail list logo
