Privacy selection Was: ASCII armor plus

2012-12-29 Thread Klaus Slott
I have just switched to use Claws mail and this gives me 3 options in Privacy System: PGP inline, PGP Mime and S Mime. On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 12:01:19 +0100 Werner Koch wrote in another tread: Here I can only suggest to use PGP/MIME - it is part of the MIME standard and should be supported by

Re: Privacy selection Was: ASCII armor plus

2012-12-29 Thread Jerry
On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 16:22:55 +0100 Klaus Slott articulated: So I guess the recommended selection should be PGP Mime like this? Unless you want to mess up signatures, etc. Seriously, while PGP inline is not dead, it is only utilized by some very old MUAs. Modern MUAs handle PGP Mime just fine.

Re: Privacy selection Was: ASCII armor plus

2012-12-29 Thread Robert J. Hansen
On 12/29/2012 12:30 PM, Jerry wrote: Unless you want to mess up signatures, etc. Seriously, while PGP inline is not dead, it is only utilized by some very old MUAs. Modern MUAs handle PGP Mime just fine. Modern MUAs, yes. Modern MTAs, no. The mail servers play hob with attachments issue is

Re: ASCII armor plus?

2012-12-27 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 12/26/2012 01:23 PM, Werner Koch wrote: BTW, we have patches for Mailman to fix the problem in most cases but they never made it to upstream. This isn't the case, as far as i can tell. Recent versions of mailman all play fine with PGP/MIME. See, for example:

Re: ASCII armor plus? - a main reason I find I and some others do not use encryption is that the messages get garbled

2012-12-26 Thread Werner Koch
On Tue, 25 Dec 2012 01:30, phonetree...@gmail.com said: The insertion of hard returns, blank lines, hyphens and so on is an issue I and others I have been trying to get to use encryption multiple times. It is one of the main reasons I don't use encryption Actually the OpenPGP armor format is

Re: ASCII armor plus?

2012-12-26 Thread Robert J. Hansen
On 12/26/2012 6:01 AM, Werner Koch wrote: Actually the OpenPGP armor format is pretty robust to the extend it can be. However, you are likely talking about mail. Here I can only suggest to use PGP/MIME - it is part of the MIME standard and should be supported by all sane mail clients. It is

Re: ASCII armor plus?

2012-12-26 Thread Werner Koch
On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 13:42, r...@sixdemonbag.org said: When the community's flagship mailing lists cannot reliably use PGP/MIME, I'm a little cautious about recommending PGP/MIME as a general-purpose, ready-for-the-end-user solution. It is a sad time for standards, I know. Let's get rid of

Re: ASCII armor plus?

2012-12-26 Thread Robert J. Hansen
On 12/26/2012 1:23 PM, Werner Koch wrote: It is a sad time for standards, I know. Let's get rid of them all and use FB or GM and we don't need to care about that all anymore. In my defense, I never said I thought PGP/MIME had no place in the OpenPGP ecosystem. I just said I was reluctant to

ASCII armor plus? - a main reason I find I and some others do not use encryption is that the messages get garbled

2012-12-25 Thread Thomas Demers
The insertion of hard returns, blank lines, hyphens and so on is an issue I and others I have been trying to get to use encryption multiple times. It is one of the main reasons I don't use encryption as much as I could; I cannot be sure that my message will actually get through because these