On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:58, ekl...@gmail.com said:
IANAL either, but wonder whether hard-coding the GPG program name and
arguments
in your binary would not be sufficient to consider your program as linked to
the
GPG executable.
Running a program is not restricted and you don't even need to
Henry Hertz Hobbit wrote:
The last time I looked at it, I had to install GPG4Win or
one of the GPG 1.x installs before I put Enigmail in THunderbird
on Windows. EnigMail is licensed under MPLv2/GPLv2 to avoid
licensing issues. If Enigmail doesn't bundle when they have
compatible licensing
On 6/15/2013 6:50 PM, John Clizbe wrote:
Licensing was discussed when we considered bundling GnuPG. It had
little to do with the decision not to bundle, AIR.
I can confirm this. According to my recollection, the argument was all
right, so what *shouldn't* we bundle, then? Once you bundle
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:49:39AM +0200, Nils Faerber wrote:
IANAL but from my understanding:
1. by invocation of the commandline commands: Yes
2. invocation of GnuPG exe: Yes
3. Linking, dynamically or statically, against a GnuPG DLL, presumed
that it is licensed under GPL: No
IANAL
Hi,
Since GnuPG comes under the GPL, I would like to clarify if a person's
proprietary software makes use of GnuPG purely by invocation of the
commandline commands, and the GnuPG exe's and DLL's are bundled
unmodified with the person's proprietary software, can the person use
GnuPG
Am 12.06.2013 07:24, schrieb Navin:
Hi,
Hi!
Since GnuPG comes under the GPL, I would like to clarify if a person's
proprietary software makes use of GnuPG purely by invocation of the
commandline commands, and the GnuPG exe's and DLL's are bundled
unmodified with the person's proprietary
On 06/12/13 10:49, Nils Faerber wrote:
Am 12.06.2013 07:24, schrieb Navin:
Since GnuPG comes under the GPL, I would like to clarify if a person's
proprietary software makes use of GnuPG purely by invocation of the
commandline commands, and the GnuPG exe's and DLL's are bundled
unmodified with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/12/2013 09:49 AM, Nils Faerber wrote:
Am 12.06.2013 07:24, schrieb Navin:
Hi,
Hi!
Since GnuPG comes under the GPL, I would like to clarify if a
person's proprietary software makes use of GnuPG purely by
invocation of the command line
