On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 23:35:34 +0100
Bo Berglund bo.bergl...@gmail.com articulated:
{snip}
You might be interested in this URL if you are still experiencing
problems, or if you just want to get a handle on what the problem might
be with the WinZIP installation.
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 14:57:59 -0500, Jerry gnupg.u...@seibercom.net
wrote:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 20:05:40 +0100
Bo Berglund bo.bergl...@gmail.com articulated:
I ordered an update for version 15 of my WinZip today (I am getting
the upgrade offer emails all the time) so I got the version 15 setup
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 13:03:39 +0100
Bo Berglund bo.bergl...@gmail.com articulated:
And I used the WinZip support form to enter two issues, but there is
absolutely no response! No good support in my view.
Interesting!
1) Are you a registered user of WinZIP; i.e. user of the commercial
version.
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 07:43:20 -0500, Jerry gnupg.u...@seibercom.net
wrote:
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 13:03:39 +0100
Bo Berglund bo.bergl...@gmail.com articulated:
And I used the WinZip support form to enter two issues, but there is
absolutely no response! No good support in my view.
Interesting!
1)
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 10:50:34 -0500, Jerry gnupg.u...@seibercom.net
wrote:
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 15:07:26 +0100
Bo Berglund bo.bergl...@gmail.com articulated:
Unfortunately the Gpg4Win 2.0.4 installer lets me choose if I want to
install *all* of the extras by having a checkbox for each. But the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Thursday 18 November 2010 at 3:50:34 PM, in
mid:20101118105034.3e870...@scorpio, Jerry wrote:
Maybe I missed it somewhere, but exactly why do you
feel 2.0.14 is unstable?
They probably remember the GnuPG 1.4.x release announcements that
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 15:56:03 +
MFPA expires2...@ymail.com articulated:
On Thursday 18 November 2010 at 3:50:34 PM, in
mid:20101118105034.3e870...@scorpio, Jerry wrote:
Maybe I missed it somewhere, but exactly why do you
feel 2.0.14 is unstable?
They probably remember the GnuPG
On 11/20/2010 2:17 PM, Jerry wrote:
Interestingly enough, I was included in both the To: Cc: fields of
this posts; however, the mailing list itself was suspiciously absent.
Obviously the poster failed to read or comprehend the disclaimer.
Given that the same message arrived in my mailbox from
@gnupg.org
CC: Jerry gnupg.u...@seibercom.net
Subject: Re: Gpg4Win 2.0.4 with GnuPG 1.4.11??
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 15:56:03 +
Reply-To: MFPA expires2...@ymail.com
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v4.0.38) Professional
He prefixed the groups mailing address: gnupg-users@gnupg.org with
Jerry on GnuPG-Users
CC: Jerry gnupg.u...@seibercom.net
Subject: Re: Gpg4Win 2.0.4 with GnuPG 1.4.11??
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 15:56:03 +
Reply-To: MFPA expires2...@ymail.com
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v4.0.38) Professional
Same format as any other posting I make to this list (except a thread
starter). All taken care
On 11/20/2010 06:24 PM, Jerry wrote:
He prefixed the groups mailing address: gnupg-users@gnupg.org with
Jerry on GnuPG-Users.
Yes MFPA always seems to do that, for no reason that i understand. I
find it unusual, unhelpful, and disorienting, but: meh. Not worth
fighting about, and it's
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 17:59, r...@sixdemonbag.org said:
Not true. For instance, WinZip is a 32-bit application, yet it
integrates just fine into the context sensitive menu.
In this case it is not an explorere extension. An explorer extensions
needs to be a 64 bit DLL. Of course using an
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 10:22:54 +0100, Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org wrote:
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 17:59, r...@sixdemonbag.org said:
Not true. For instance, WinZip is a 32-bit application, yet it
integrates just fine into the context sensitive menu.
In this case it is not an explorere extension. An
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 19:44:15 -0500, Avi avi.w...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Bo Berglund bo.bergl...@gmail.com
To: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 23:40:59 +0100
Subject: Re: Gpg4Win 2.0.4 with GnuPG 1.4.11??
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:59:07 -0500, Robert J. Hansen
r...@sixdemonbag.org
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:34, bo.bergl...@gmail.com said:
But this is a *source* download, how do I get a binary to install in
Windows7??
see doc/README.W32. For your convience I yank it here:
How to build GnuPG from the source:
===
Until recently all official
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:48:49 -0500, Jerry gnupg.u...@seibercom.net
wrote:
Winzip 15. 9.0 is /way/ old and likely is having problems operating
with the quite-new Windows 7. Microsoft made some very substantial
changes to the way Windows works during the XP-to-Vista transition: I
suspect
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 18:29:48 +0100, Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org wrote:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:34, bo.bergl...@gmail.com said:
But this is a *source* download, how do I get a binary to install in
Windows7??
see doc/README.W32. For your convience I yank it here:
How to build GnuPG from the
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 20:05:40 +0100
Bo Berglund bo.bergl...@gmail.com articulated:
I ordered an update for version 15 of my WinZip today (I am getting
the upgrade offer emails all the time) so I got the version 15 setup
file.
But unfortunately for some reason the installer failed to start. I
I want to get my hands on the utilities shipped with Gpg4Win
(Kleopatra, GpgEx etc) but I do *not* want to have my GnuPG 1.4.11
clobbered in the process.
Unfortunately the Gpg4Win 2.0.4 installer lets me choose if I want to
install *all* of the extras by having a checkbox for each. But the
GnuPG
On 11/18/2010 11:24 AM, Bo Berglund wrote:
Microsoft has decided that 32 bit applications cannot be allowed to
integrate with the Windows Explorer context sensitive menu.
Not true. For instance, WinZip is a 32-bit application, yet it
integrates just fine into the context sensitive menu.
If
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:59:07 -0500, Robert J. Hansen
r...@sixdemonbag.org wrote:
On 11/18/2010 11:24 AM, Bo Berglund wrote:
Microsoft has decided that 32 bit applications cannot be allowed to
integrate with the Windows Explorer context sensitive menu.
Not true. For instance, WinZip is a
On 11/18/2010 5:40 PM, Bo Berglund wrote:
Which version of WinZip?
I use WinZip 9.0 SR1
Winzip 15. 9.0 is /way/ old and likely is having problems operating
with the quite-new Windows 7. Microsoft made some very substantial
changes to the way Windows works during the XP-to-Vista transition:
22 matches
Mail list logo
