On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 06:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I am MacOS X user (10.4.6), unable till now to compile 2.0.1 (posted a
few messages explaining why).
If you are MacOS X user, could you please explain how you succeeded to
compile 2.0.1. Thanks.
I know that there are some problems. Please
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 05:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I don't recall seeing this before, but I don't use the info docs much,
so maybe I've just missed it previously. It seems that 1.4.6 changed
the texinfo file to use the dircategory GNU Utilities just as 2.0.1
does. 1.4.5 used GnuPG. Without
Werner Koch wrote:
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 05:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I don't recall seeing this before, but I don't use the info docs
much, so maybe I've just missed it previously. It seems that 1.4.6
changed the texinfo file to use the dircategory GNU Utilities
just as 2.0.1 does. 1.4.5
I was updating my system to 1.4.6 today and noticed the following in
the make install output (I've got 2.0.1 installed already):
install-info: menu item `gpg' already exists, for file `gnupg'
I don't recall seeing this before, but I don't use the info docs much,
so maybe I've just missed it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Todd Zullinger wrote the following on 12/6/06 11:37 PM:
I was updating my system to 1.4.6 today and noticed the following in
the make install output (I've got 2.0.1 installed already):
install-info: menu item `gpg' already exists, for file
Charly Avital wrote:
I am MacOS X user (10.4.6), unable till now to compile 2.0.1 (posted
a few messages explaining why).
If you are MacOS X user, could you please explain how you succeeded
to compile 2.0.1. Thanks.
Sorry, I'm using linux.
--
ToddOpenPGP - KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL:
