Somebody claiming to be David Shaw wrote:
On Jan 3, 2013, at 9:53 PM, Stephen Paul Weber singpol...@singpolyma.net
wrote:
tell gpg or gpg2 to produce new packet length headers for output?
No. GPG automatically uses the old packet headers for those packets that
can be described that way
On Jan 4, 2013, at 9:39 AM, Stephen Paul Weber singpol...@singpolyma.net
wrote:
Somebody claiming to be David Shaw wrote:
On Jan 3, 2013, at 9:53 PM, Stephen Paul Weber singpol...@singpolyma.net
wrote:
tell gpg or gpg2 to produce new packet length headers for output?
No. GPG
Somebody claiming to be David Shaw wrote:
On Jan 4, 2013, at 9:39 AM, Stephen Paul Weber singpol...@singpolyma.net
wrote:
Somebody claiming to be David Shaw wrote:
On Jan 3, 2013, at 9:53 PM, Stephen Paul Weber singpol...@singpolyma.net
wrote:
tell gpg or gpg2 to produce new packet length
On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 17:34, singpol...@singpolyma.net said:
headers. Such implementations' ouput can be read by gpg, but there's
currently no way to convince gpg to talk to them :)
I just checked the RFC and it says:
If interoperability [with PGP 2] is not an issue, the new packet
Is there a set of switches to tell gpg or gpg2 to produce new packet
length headers for output? Specifically
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4880#section-4.2.2.
--
Stephen Paul Weber, @singpolyma
See http://singpolyma.net for how I prefer to be contacted
edition right joseph
On Jan 3, 2013, at 9:53 PM, Stephen Paul Weber singpol...@singpolyma.net
wrote:
Is there a set of switches to tell gpg or gpg2 to produce new packet length
headers for output? Specifically
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4880#section-4.2.2.
No. GPG automatically uses the old packet headers
