On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 21:56, Daniel Kahn Gillmor said:
> For example, GnuPG could instead offer an interface with explicit
> options to allow the user to choose to match certificates by
> fingerprint, or by e-mail address, or by name, or by full User ID, but
Simply prefix the fingerprint with 0x
On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 8:57 PM Daniel Kahn Gillmor via Gnupg-users
wrote:
> I agree with you that it's nice to refer to people by human-memorable
> names. I just wish it was safe to do so.
I would consider it is safe to do so. It is in fact mostly the entire purpose
of GPG to identify the
On Fri 2024-03-01 17:06:09 +0100, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 29. Februar 2024 21:21:42 CET Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> human-readable names for certificates. But i don't see how to use that
>> safely while dealing with GnuPG's risky implementation choices here.
>
> Allowing recipients
On Donnerstag, 29. Februar 2024 21:21:42 CET Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> human-readable names for certificates. But i don't see how to use that
> safely while dealing with GnuPG's risky implementation choices here.
Allowing recipients to be specified by email address (or some other part of a
