On 31/05/12 5:32 PM, Werner Koch wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2012 21:42, expires2...@rocketmail.com said:
And shared the fact privately with Symantec?
I heard that it is just a bug introduced by the marketing suits.
The PGP library never dropped support for DSA2.
Was there any explanation of
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 10:49, b...@adversary.org said:
Was there any explanation of why the marketing people dropped or
wanted to drop the functionality?
Maybe outdated technical specs which made it to the marketing dept. I
don't know - you need to ask Symantec.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 5/06/12 2:47 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 10:49, b...@adversary.org said:
Was there any explanation of why the marketing people dropped or
wanted to drop the functionality?
Maybe outdated technical specs which made it to
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 19:11, b...@adversary.org said:
Fair enough. Most people I correspond with use GPG, I'll worry about
it if I ever have trouble with someone encrypting to my El-Gamal key.
Not for a compliant OpenPGP implemenations. From RFC-4880:
Implementations MUST implement DSA for
On Wed, 30 May 2012 21:42, expires2...@rocketmail.com said:
And shared the fact privately with Symantec?
I heard that it is just a bug introduced by the marketing suits. The
PGP library never dropped support for DSA2.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt
Hi
On Friday 25 May 2012 at 10:22:45 AM, in
mid:4fbf4f65.3000...@vulcan.xs4all.nl, Johan Wevers wrote:
Maybe the NSA has found a workable solution for
factoring but not for DL?
And shared the fact privately with Symantec?
--
Best regards
MFPA
On 25-05-2012 4:20, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
Looking over the PGP product offerings after their acquisition by
Symantec, it seems they have dropped support for 2048- and 3072-bit DSA.
This decision makes no sense to me, and is sufficiently weird that I
wonder if the marketing copy is horribly
On Friday 25 of May 2012 11:22:45 Johan Wevers wrote:
On 25-05-2012 4:20, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
product they offer:
* Diffie-Hellman
* DSA (1024-bit keys only)
* RSA (up to 4096-bit keys)
Seems they want to push everyone to RSA. I wonder why? The patent issue
is over so
Looking over the PGP product offerings after their acquisition by
Symantec, it seems they have dropped support for 2048- and 3072-bit DSA.
This decision makes no sense to me, and is sufficiently weird that I
wonder if the marketing copy is horribly in error. However, the
marketing copy is clear
