Re: Why a full keys and sub keys backup are not proposed when keys and sub keys are done on-card ?

2009-09-28 Thread Werner Koch
On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 20:59, tux.tsn...@free.fr said: Thanks for your answer, I'm agree with you for sign key, but for the authentication key, if it's used to ssh server connection on more than 100 servers for the user root for example, if you lost this key, you It is always a tradeoff between

Why a full keys and sub keys backup are not proposed when keys and sub keys are done on-card ?

2009-09-28 Thread tux . tsndcb
Hi Werner, Thanks for these informations. Best Regards - Mail Original - De: Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org À: tux tsndcb tux.tsn...@free.fr Cc: gnupg-users@gnupg.org Envoyé: Lundi 28 Septembre 2009 09h34:28 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne Objet: Re: Why

Why a full keys and sub keys backup are not proposed when keys and sub keys are done on-card ?

2009-09-27 Thread tux . tsndcb
Hi, Just for information, I wanted to known why you don't propose a full backup of the three keys (Sign, encryption and authentication) when keys are generated on-card. Because only encryption key is backupted, a good idea will be perhaps to add also authentication key in the backup. Thanks

Re: Why a full keys and sub keys backup are not proposed when keys and sub keys are done on-card ?

2009-09-27 Thread Werner Koch
On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 09:38, tux.tsn...@free.fr said: Just for information, I wanted to known why you don't propose a full backup of the three keys (Sign, encryption and authentication) when keys are generated on-card. Because only encryption key is backupted, a good idea will be perhaps to

Why a full keys and sub keys backup are not proposed when keys and sub keys are done on-card ?

2009-09-27 Thread tux . tsndcb
Hi Werner, Thanks for your answer, I'm agree with you for sign key, but for the authentication key, if it's used to ssh server connection on more than 100 servers for the user root for example, if you lost this key, you cannot more connect on server with the user root. In this case, I think it