Re: [go-cd] shouldn't required resources also be at the pipeline level?

With that description, if you want to use *environments * rather than resources (and assuming you don't use environments for any other purpose), I

Re: [go-cd] shouldn't required resources also be at the pipeline level?

You would have agents on the various machines, tag the agents with specific resource tags, and tag specific jobs with those resource tags. — Sriram On Sun, 23 Jul 2023 at 8:21 PM, Joshua Franta wrote: > appreciate so many responses. i think we're a little apart so i'll take > the suggestion

Re: [go-cd] shouldn't required resources also be at the pipeline level?

appreciate so many responses. i think we're a little apart so i'll take the suggestion to give our example: GROUPA = machines that have less beefy hardware GROUPB = more expensive machines we'd like to: 1. have a couple of pipelines only run on the more expensive machines 2. have all