Re: [Gossip] Re: Mhonarc problems at mail-archive.com

2001-11-12 Thread Louis Proyect
Everything looks great!!! Thanks, guys. -- Louis Proyect, [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 11/12/2001 Marxism list: http://www.marxmail.org ___ Gossip mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jab.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gossip

[Gossip] Re: Mhonarc problems at mail-archive.com

2001-11-11 Thread Louis N Proyect
Thanks, Earl. I only hope the guys at mail-archive.com (hiya!) can put 2.5 back in as soon as they straighten out some of the performance issues. I guess my other question is what would be the simplest way to re-build the date index after they do that (taking notes, fellows?). On Sat, 10 Nov

Re: [Gossip] Re: Mhonarc problems at mail-archive.com

2001-11-11 Thread Earl Hood
On November 10, 2001 at 00:04, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: Version v2.5 avoids this problem since HEADER and FOOTER resources are no longer supported. I downgraded backed to mhonarc 2.4.9 to see if it would help with performance problems. Was there a difference? In fact, the time sequence

Re: [Gossip] Re: Mhonarc problems at mail-archive.com

2001-11-11 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
I downgraded backed to mhonarc 2.4.9 to see if it would help with performance problems. Was there a difference? I think so, although there were a lot of other things making the determination unclear. For starters: A near full filesystem, a runaway process consuming one of the CPU's,