Hi -
genbox must work. You add the first molecule, then the second molecule
and so on. So, I suggest to run genbox for a few times and have enough
empty space available in the box. Otherwise, there is a wonderful tool
called PACKMOL.
The acid molecule looks pretty sexy. I guess it will not be
Hi,
I'm not the expert here, but I think that gmx select -selrpos has options
that you should be able to use here. See gmx help selections positions
Mark
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:43 PM, Huang Dongxu fred...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a system consists of a box of water and a monolayer of
Thanks Justin.
I have increased the cutoff, and yeah thats work. There were no error
message anymore. The first 6 nanoseconds, i felt the simulation run slower.
Felt so curious that simulation run very fast the rest of time.
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:
On 10/26/14 9:17 AM, Nizar Masbukhin wrote:
Thanks Justin.
I have increased the cutoff, and yeah thats work. There were no error
message anymore. The first 6 nanoseconds, i felt the simulation run slower.
Felt so curious that simulation run very fast the rest of time.
Longer cutoffs mean
regarding gaining speed in implicit solvent simulation, i have tried to
parallelize using -ntmpi flag. However gromacs doesn't allow as i use group
cutoff-scheme. Any recommendation how to parallelise implicit solvent
simulation? I do need parallelise my simulation. I have found the same
question
Does anyone happen to remember what the frequencies in
histo-clust.xvg from g_clustsize mean?
Are they directly comparable between different systems?
Dr. Vitaly V. Chaban
Виталий Витальевич ЧАБАН
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
Dear GROMACS Users,
I have wrote a small tool g_distMat (https://github.com/rjdkmr/g_distMat).
It is almost similar to the g_mdmat.
Features:
Average minimum-distance matrix (residue-wise) between two index groups
Related Standard deviation and variance matrix
Fraction of Contacts(map) over
Hello:
I am going to make statistics for how much percentage H-bond formed for
residue A and B. I am just wondering how can we to do this?
thank you very much.
Albert
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List
Hello Gromacs users,
I have a trajectory file script18_o.trr that I am trying to process. Using
gmxcheck, this file appears to be complete. When I execute the command below
trjconv -f ../script18/script18_o.trr -s ../script17/script17_o.tpr -o
tmp1.trr -pbc whole EOF
0
EOF
the code moves
Dear Users
I have gone through the tutorial on umbrella sampling by Dr. Lemkul and am
using the methodology described therein for running my own simulations.
It is explained that :-
GROMACS calculates distances while simultaneously taking periodicity into
account. This, if you have a 10-nm box,
Dear Users
I am following the Umbrella Sampling tutorial by Dr. Lemkul and would like
to have one of my doubts addressed :-
After using pdb2gmx on the supplied pdb file , a topology file is obtained
specifying the topology files for different protein chains in .itp format..
Inside the .itp files
Hi I plan to plot the ramachandran plot of all the dihedral angles each of
which is averaged over time-frames of trajectories. But, I find g_rama or g_chi
gives the time profile of ramachandran plot. But, if I want to plot the
time-averaged Phi.Psi angles of all residues, is there any method
Hi,
The output does drop in frequency at some point, so that might be all you
are seeing. Experiment with -b and values around the putative problem area.
Mark
On Oct 26, 2014 6:59 PM, Eric Smoll ericsm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Gromacs users,
I have a trajectory file script18_o.trr that I am
Hi Mark,
Thank you for responding so rapidly. I should note that identical
processing (I use a script) on the trajectories produced by slightly
different chemical systems had no problem and trajconv produced a complete
processed trajectory.
However, when processing the problematic few with
On 10/26/14 9:55 AM, Nizar Masbukhin wrote:
regarding gaining speed in implicit solvent simulation, i have tried to
parallelize using -ntmpi flag. However gromacs doesn't allow as i use group
cutoff-scheme. Any recommendation how to parallelise implicit solvent
simulation? I do need
On 10/26/14 3:43 PM, Agnivo Gosai wrote:
Dear Users
I have gone through the tutorial on umbrella sampling by Dr. Lemkul and am
using the methodology described therein for running my own simulations.
It is explained that :-
GROMACS calculates distances while simultaneously taking periodicity
Thanks for your help. And actually my version of gromacs does not have genbox
anymore. (http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/How-tos/Tool_Changes_for_5.0 at
the bottom: GENBOX - This tool has been split to gmx solvate and gmx
insert-molecules.) But it's no big deal, insert-molecules seemed to
On 10/26/14 10:49 PM, Nathan K Houtz wrote:
Thanks for your help. And actually my version of gromacs does not have genbox
anymore. (http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/How-tos/Tool_Changes_for_5.0 at
the bottom: GENBOX - This tool has been split to gmx solvate and gmx
insert-molecules.)
Dear Gromacs Users
I would like to analyze frame number 150 to 160 out of 1000 frames. I have
been trying to load frames of my interest into vmd. But I was not able to
do it. Please tell me how to use it.
Thanks in advance
Surya
Graduate student
India
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please
Dear Suryanarayana,
Try this, I hope it will help
g_rmsf -f file.trr -s file.tpr -res -b 150 -e 160 -ox Required_frame.pdb
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Seera Suryanarayana paluso...@gmail.com
wrote:
Dear Gromacs Users
I would like to analyze frame number 150 to 160 out of 1000 frames.
20 matches
Mail list logo