Re: [gmx-users] Specbond.dat file

2018-05-22 Thread Hemalatha Jayabal
n't need to add anything extra for your residue there if it > doesn't do anything like a disulphide would. > > Cheers > > Paul > > > On 2018-05-22 09:24, Hemalatha Jayabal wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I have added a residue (Hydroxyproline) to my .rtp fil

[gmx-users] Specbond.dat file

2018-05-22 Thread Hemalatha Jayabal
Hi all, I have added a residue (Hydroxyproline) to my .rtp files and have updated the hdb and ffbonded files. While browsing through the manual about specbond.dat, it says that any "special bonds" are to be listed specifically here. Does this mean for the newly added residue also, the bond

Re: [gmx-users] Non integer charge value

2018-05-11 Thread Hemalatha Jayabal
1.008 ; qtot 1.18 On 11-May-2018 12:06, "Hemalatha Jayabal" <hemalathajaya...@gmail.com> wrote: I applied the said terminus as well but I ended up getting the same error. [ atoms ] ; nr type resnr residue atom cgnr charge mass typeB chargeB massB ; residue 202 HYP rtp HYP q +1.2 1

Re: [gmx-users] Non integer charge value

2018-05-11 Thread Hemalatha Jayabal
; qtot 0.75 54 H 205 HYP HD1 54 0.43 1.008 ; qtot 1.18 Thank you! On Fri 11 May, 2018, 00:11 Justin Lemkul, <jalem...@vt.edu> wrote: > > > On 5/10/18 8:57 AM, Hemalatha Jayabal wrote: > > The magnitude of the charge is 0.18 and I hope such magnitude cannot be > > ignore

Re: [gmx-users] Non integer charge value

2018-05-10 Thread Hemalatha Jayabal
t; On 5/10/18 8:29 AM, Hemalatha Jayabal wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I have added a non standard amino acid 'Hydroxyproline' to my forcefield > > (from literature) Charmm27 and after using pdb2gmx i could see that the > > system has a non integer charge value for 1 prote

[gmx-users] Non integer charge value

2018-05-10 Thread Hemalatha Jayabal
Hi all, I have added a non standard amino acid 'Hydroxyproline' to my forcefield (from literature) Charmm27 and after using pdb2gmx i could see that the system has a non integer charge value for 1 protein chain out of 3 protein chains. (All 3 chains contain the non standard amino acid) The

[gmx-users] Improper dihedrals ordering issue

2018-05-10 Thread Hemalatha Jayabal
as to whether the dihedral parameters from ffbonded could be re-ordered for this case and could be used. (The order mentioned in topology but parameters for same dihedral in ffbonded) I hope I am clear regarding my query Regards Hemalatha Jayabal -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search