Re: GTK+-2.0.1 released

2002-03-31 Thread Drazen Kacar
Owen Taylor wrote: Havoc Pennington [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well, with the important caveat that you should NOT install outside of your $prefix - if your app is in a separate prefix from GTK, users will need to set a module search path env variable, which we hopefully provide (?).

Re: GTK+-2.0.1 released

2002-03-31 Thread Drazen Kacar
Owen Taylor wrote: Drazen Kacar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It would be nice if GTK would search $(app_libdir)/gtk-2.0 if the OS can provide that information. And maybe some other directories in other cases. And what if GTK+ goes in /opt/gtk, the app goes in /usr/local and the module

Default fonts

2001-11-10 Thread Drazen Kacar
I've been playing with my font path and came to the conclusion that the default font specification that GTK (1.2.10) uses is not good enough. So I'd like to set up more specific font specifications in the system-wide gtkrc files. I need settings for several locales: - C and any ISO 8859-1

Re: compile glib with sunpro

2001-07-14 Thread Drazen Kacar
Havoc Pennington wrote: Ian Britten [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: GLib has abstractions for various compiler-specific mechanisms (gint64, the inline stuff, G_GNUC_PRINTF, etc.). There's no way to support those without being compiler-specific. Probably there is a way to do it, if you want to

Re: glib not building on Solaris 64Bit w/ Workshop 5.0 cc

2001-05-29 Thread Drazen Kacar
Mark Ashley wrote: This should probably be a faq since it's so prevalent in google, though no-one seems to have come up with a solution. I don't have pkg-config and I don't know what else I would need, so I can't actually try to compile it. cc -xtarget=ultra -xarch=v9 -xcode=pic32

Re: Data Types

2001-05-25 Thread Drazen Kacar
Erik Mouw wrote: On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 01:19:20PM +1000, Helmethead wrote: If ints are 64 bits, how do you get 32 and 16 bit vars? Are 64 bit architectures missing one of these? Yes, because all 64 bit CPUs I know are RISC CPUs, they don't like anything else then their native format.

Re: scrollbar display options

2001-04-28 Thread Drazen Kacar
Ronald Bultje wrote: On 2001.04.27 19:26:35 +0200 Iain wrote: Users - maybe/yes Programmers - NO! I completely disagree here. Why would a programmer not have the choice of design what his program would look like? In the ideal case, the programmer _can_ let the user decide but he _can_

Re: scrollbar display options

2001-04-28 Thread Drazen Kacar
Erik Mouw wrote: On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 06:04:54PM +0200, Drazen Kacar wrote: Any tutorial or introductory material on accessibility? Back in the old days, every Sun system came with a box loaded with manuals. One of them was the Open Look graphical user interface application style

Re: scrollbar display options

2001-04-28 Thread Drazen Kacar
Erik Mouw wrote: The book is is copyright 1990, so I think it came with SunOS 4.1.3 or Oh, that. so. My group was a Sun shop at that time, so we had copies everywhere. I was using terminals exclusively at the time, so I'm not even thinking of SunOS as something with a GUI. But yeah, I think

Re: Warning when making toolbars

2001-03-22 Thread Drazen Kacar
Havoc Pennington wrote: The only widgets that normally have a different colormap are GtkPreview and GnomePixmap, when used on SGI machines. Why is that? -- .-. .-.Sarcasm is just one more service we offer. (_ \ / _) |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |

Re: Warning when making toolbars

2001-03-22 Thread Drazen Kacar
Havoc Pennington wrote: Drazen Kacar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Havoc Pennington wrote: The only widgets that normally have a different colormap are GtkPreview and GnomePixmap, when used on SGI machines. Why is that? Because some SGIs try doing this thing where the default

Re: gtk+-1.2.10

2001-03-13 Thread Drazen Kacar
J. Ali Harlow wrote: In the meantime, we will be forced to ship stable versions that subvert your check if you refuse to provide a workaround. The code is already written and in place. The user will see nothing. Wow, we could play a game here. Owen scores a point whenever he releases GTK

Re: installing 2.8

2001-03-09 Thread Drazen Kacar
Matt Eisemann wrote: Does anyone know what the below solution was for. Right now I am trying IIRC, that was a change to gtk-config script. It's necessary when building applications to ensure that they manage to find GTK libraries, so that one can avoid having to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH.

Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released

2001-03-02 Thread Drazen Kacar
Owen Taylor wrote: Overview of Changes in GTK+ 1.2.9: == * Refuse to initialize GTK+ when setuid (http://www.gtk.org/setuid.html) Is this just setuid or it includes setgid? There are games which are setgid to group games for the sole purpose of having the

Re: installing 2.8

2000-11-13 Thread Drazen Kacar
Matt Eisemann wrote: Finally I can get back to this. Well now I can get back to this. To answer the questions below, the compiler that I am using is gcc (not cc). I will prog provide some of the makefile for your inspection and see if that looks right. . . . . CFLAGS = -g -ansi

Re: installing 2.8

2000-10-28 Thread Drazen Kacar
Matt Eisemann wrote: Well, it turns out that since running Sun Solaris it does not use 'ld' in the /etc directory to find the libraries but solaris does rely on the LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable to find the GTK and GLIB libraries. My application works now but the only disturbin thing is that

Re: installing 2.8

2000-10-26 Thread Drazen Kacar
Matt Eisemann wrote: so should my LD_LIBRARY_PATH be set to the directory that contains the files such as libglib.a, libglib.la, libgmodule.a... and so forth. If so, they both seem right. The environment GLIB_CONFIG is set to /home/matt/mppcm/ssep/GTK/glib/glib-1.2.8 which is the directory

Re: installing 2.8

2000-10-26 Thread Drazen Kacar
Dugas, Alan wrote: It appears either way works. For this particular application. Did you check if it breaks any other application on your system? It seems to me just a qustion of preference. Until you have libraries with the same name in different directories. Without LD_LIBRARY_PATH

Re: Installation Problems under Solaris

2000-10-03 Thread Drazen Kacar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 03 Oct 2000 12:52:08 BST, Haydn Haines - Sun UK - Partner Support - Intern [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I'm trying to compile gtk+-1.2.8 on an Ultra 1 running Solaris 2.6 w/Glib 1.2.8, gcc and gmake (also tried make). "configure" appears to work fine,

Re: Installation Problems under Solaris

2000-10-03 Thread Drazen Kacar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 03 Oct 2000 15:58:43 +0200, Drazen Kacar said: /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.6/2.95.2/include/sys/stream.h: I'm not sure about that. gcc 2.95.x doesn't need fixincludes on Solaris. Umm.. if it doesn't need fixincludes, why did a copy

Re: Installation Problems under Solaris

2000-10-03 Thread Drazen Kacar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 03 Oct 2000 16:14:39 +0200, Drazen Kacar said: That's the only file in ../include/sys directory. I don't have the exact OS and compiler versions which the original poster used, but the contents on Solaris 7 gcc 2.95.1 installation is: Note that that's

Re: Installation Problems under Solaris

2000-10-03 Thread Drazen Kacar
Haydn Haines - Sun UK - Partner Support - Intern wrote: hmmm... /usr/local/include is in the compile line... but not /usr/include I will try that! No. -I/usr/include must not be there. It is implicitely added by the compiler, but in case of gcc it should be added after some other include

Re: where's the gdk?

2000-09-18 Thread Drazen Kacar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 18 Sep 2000, Havoc Pennington wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So, where does one go to get the latest and greatest gdk? It is just a part of GTK. Install GTK. So, are you saying the gdk "package" is distributed as part of the gtk+ "package", but is a

Re: Compile Problem

2000-09-14 Thread Drazen Kacar
Super-User wrote: Greetings fellow etherealers, This is GTK list, not Ethereal, but anyway... I am trying to compile ethereal on Solaris 8 x86. I have all the latest required packages installed. When I run ./configure, this is what I get. checking to see if we can add

Re: A new application builder for the GTK

2000-08-30 Thread Drazen Kacar
Oliver Singla wrote: To describe a new widget, I have choosen to go with a table (populated to describe resources available for the widget) vs. other methods (custom widget as in Glade, for example). Would it be possible to add some Xt code to the application and then use X resources to