Owen Taylor wrote:
Havoc Pennington [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, with the important caveat that you should NOT install outside of
your $prefix - if your app is in a separate prefix from GTK, users
will need to set a module search path env variable, which we hopefully
provide (?).
Owen Taylor wrote:
Drazen Kacar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It would be nice if GTK would search $(app_libdir)/gtk-2.0 if the OS
can provide that information. And maybe some other directories in other
cases.
And what if GTK+ goes in /opt/gtk, the app goes in /usr/local
and the module
I've been playing with my font path and came to the conclusion that the
default font specification that GTK (1.2.10) uses is not good enough. So
I'd like to set up more specific font specifications in the system-wide
gtkrc files.
I need settings for several locales:
- C and any ISO 8859-1
Havoc Pennington wrote:
Ian Britten [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
GLib has abstractions for various compiler-specific mechanisms
(gint64, the inline stuff, G_GNUC_PRINTF, etc.). There's no way to
support those without being compiler-specific.
Probably there is a way to do it, if you want to
Mark Ashley wrote:
This should probably be a faq since it's so prevalent in google, though
no-one seems to have come up with a solution.
I don't have pkg-config and I don't know what else I would need, so I
can't actually try to compile it.
cc -xtarget=ultra -xarch=v9 -xcode=pic32
Erik Mouw wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 01:19:20PM +1000, Helmethead wrote:
If ints are 64 bits, how do you get 32 and 16 bit vars? Are 64 bit architectures
missing one of these?
Yes, because all 64 bit CPUs I know are RISC CPUs, they don't like
anything else then their native format.
Ronald Bultje wrote:
On 2001.04.27 19:26:35 +0200 Iain wrote:
Users - maybe/yes
Programmers - NO!
I completely disagree here.
Why would a programmer not have the choice of design what his program would
look like? In the ideal case, the programmer _can_ let the user decide but
he _can_
Erik Mouw wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 06:04:54PM +0200, Drazen Kacar wrote:
Any tutorial or introductory material on accessibility?
Back in the old days, every Sun system came with a box loaded with
manuals. One of them was the Open Look graphical user interface
application style
Erik Mouw wrote:
The book is is copyright 1990, so I think it came with SunOS 4.1.3 or
Oh, that.
so. My group was a Sun shop at that time, so we had copies everywhere.
I was using terminals exclusively at the time, so I'm not even thinking of
SunOS as something with a GUI. But yeah, I think
Havoc Pennington wrote:
The only widgets that normally have a different colormap are
GtkPreview and GnomePixmap, when used on SGI machines.
Why is that?
--
.-. .-.Sarcasm is just one more service we offer.
(_ \ / _)
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
Havoc Pennington wrote:
Drazen Kacar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Havoc Pennington wrote:
The only widgets that normally have a different colormap are
GtkPreview and GnomePixmap, when used on SGI machines.
Why is that?
Because some SGIs try doing this thing where the default
J. Ali Harlow wrote:
In the meantime, we will be forced
to ship stable versions that subvert your check if you refuse to provide a
workaround. The code is already written and in place. The user will see
nothing.
Wow, we could play a game here. Owen scores a point whenever he releases
GTK
Matt Eisemann wrote:
Does anyone know what the below solution was for. Right now I am trying
IIRC, that was a change to gtk-config script. It's necessary when building
applications to ensure that they manage to find GTK libraries, so that
one can avoid having to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
Owen Taylor wrote:
Overview of Changes in GTK+ 1.2.9:
==
* Refuse to initialize GTK+ when setuid (http://www.gtk.org/setuid.html)
Is this just setuid or it includes setgid? There are games which are
setgid to group games for the sole purpose of having the
Matt Eisemann wrote:
Finally I can get back to this. Well now I can get back to this. To
answer the questions below, the compiler that I am using is gcc (not cc).
I will prog provide some of the makefile for your inspection and see if
that looks right. . . . .
CFLAGS = -g -ansi
Matt Eisemann wrote:
Well, it turns out that since running Sun Solaris it does not use 'ld' in
the /etc directory to find the libraries but solaris does rely on the
LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable to find the GTK and GLIB libraries. My
application works now but the only disturbin thing is that
Matt Eisemann wrote:
so should my LD_LIBRARY_PATH be set to the directory that contains the
files such as libglib.a, libglib.la, libgmodule.a... and so forth.
If so, they both seem right. The environment GLIB_CONFIG is set to
/home/matt/mppcm/ssep/GTK/glib/glib-1.2.8 which is the directory
Dugas, Alan wrote:
It appears either way works.
For this particular application. Did you check if it breaks any other
application on your system?
It seems to me just a qustion of preference.
Until you have libraries with the same name in different directories.
Without LD_LIBRARY_PATH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 03 Oct 2000 12:52:08 BST, Haydn Haines - Sun UK - Partner Support - Intern
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'm trying to compile gtk+-1.2.8 on an Ultra 1 running Solaris 2.6 w/Glib
1.2.8, gcc and gmake (also tried make). "configure" appears to work fine,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 03 Oct 2000 15:58:43 +0200, Drazen Kacar said:
/usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.6/2.95.2/include/sys/stream.h:
I'm not sure about that. gcc 2.95.x doesn't need fixincludes on Solaris.
Umm.. if it doesn't need fixincludes, why did a copy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 03 Oct 2000 16:14:39 +0200, Drazen Kacar said:
That's the only file in ../include/sys directory. I don't have the exact
OS and compiler versions which the original poster used, but the contents
on Solaris 7 gcc 2.95.1 installation is:
Note that that's
Haydn Haines - Sun UK - Partner Support - Intern wrote:
hmmm... /usr/local/include is in the compile line... but not /usr/include I will
try
that!
No. -I/usr/include must not be there. It is implicitely added by the compiler,
but in case of gcc it should be added after some other include
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 18 Sep 2000, Havoc Pennington wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, where does one go to get the latest and greatest gdk?
It is just a part of GTK. Install GTK.
So, are you saying the gdk "package" is distributed as part of the gtk+
"package", but is a
Super-User wrote:
Greetings fellow etherealers,
This is GTK list, not Ethereal, but anyway...
I am trying to compile ethereal on Solaris 8 x86. I have all the
latest required packages installed. When I run ./configure, this is
what I get.
checking to see if we can add
Oliver Singla wrote:
To describe a new widget, I have choosen to go with a
table (populated to describe resources available for
the widget) vs. other methods (custom widget as in
Glade, for example).
Would it be possible to add some Xt code to the application and then use
X resources to
25 matches
Mail list logo