Hi Enrico,
At Mon, 20 Feb 2012 13:08:05 +0100,
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
[...]
and the call now would be
create_foo(G_CSTR_STATIC(hello world));
in case we dont have an static string, but something with
limited lifetime, it could look like this:
create_foo(G_CSTR_DYNAMIC(bar));
At Sat, 21 May 2011 03:37:38 +0200,
Olav Vitters wrote:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 09:06:32PM +, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
I am looking for comments from git experts on any of the operations
I'm doing and how feasible would be to rewrite the git.gnome.org
repository. The resulting repository
At Wed, 20 Apr 2011 01:05:12 +0900,
Mizuho Matsunaga wrote:
gmake[4]: Entering directory `/opt/src/gtk+-3.0.9/gtk'
CC gtksearchenginesimple.lo
/usr/include/sys/feature_tests.h, line 332: #error: Compiler or options
invalid for pre-UNIX 03 X
/Open applications and pre-2001 POSIX
Hi Steven,
At Mon, 11 Apr 2011 01:22:29 +0100,
Steven Swann wrote:
Hello All,
I believe I have found a bug.
Background:
I am cross-compiling glib for an ARM11 target. I have built the
toolchain loosely on the CLFS book.
I am looking to get OPIE running on the board and as such,
Hi,
At Thu, 25 Nov 2010 17:01:51 -0800,
Henry Kroll wrote:
[...]
(gdb) p node
$1 = (TypeNode *) 0x4039
^^^If you will note here, node has a very odd value when it crashes from
clicking the mouse on it. It is normally something like (TypeNode *)
0x80529d8 and the
Hi,
# I'm not an expart of data/time, timer precision or anything. but,
# working with some embedded systems. so I might be biased by that.
At Mon, 01 Nov 2010 12:06:48 -0400,
Ryan Lortie wrote:
- microseconds ought to be enough for anybody
A nanosecond is on the scale of
At Thu, 22 Jul 2010 10:24:05 +0100,
Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
Also, I'm aware that we are very close to a release. I'd understand if
that'd make people not want to merge it. But I think it's worth it and
the impact is very small compared to the other changes in Gtk3.
I tend to agree,
Hi,
At Mon, 2 Aug 2010 22:14:05 -0400,
Havoc Pennington wrote:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Yasushi SHOJI ya...@atmark-techno.com wrote:
what am I missing? or what should I do to port a RGB565 application to
new 3.0 platform?
What are you doing with the RGB565 data? GdkImage only
Hi,
just noticed that GLocalFile have a static function to canonicalize a
file name, canonicalize_filename(). the function does not depends on
gio funcs at all.
So, wouldn't it be nice to have in glib, say gutils.c::g_path_canonicalize() ?
would you take a patch if I create it?
Thanks,
--
At Tue, 3 Aug 2010 12:34:55 +0200,
Christian Dywan wrote:
See https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111848
ah! next time I'll search the bugzilla first.
Thanks,
--
yashi
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
Hi,
At Tue, 3 Aug 2010 08:43:07 -0400,
Havoc Pennington wrote:
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 5:14 AM, Yasushi SHOJI ya...@atmark-techno.com wrote:
I assume I can't do the following:
pixbuf = gdk_pixbuf_get_from_drawable(NULL,window,NULL, ...);
Oh, this is really not what you want
At Thu, 22 Jul 2010 10:24:05 +0100,
Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
Also, I'm aware that we are very close to a release. I'd understand if
that'd make people not want to merge it. But I think it's worth it and
the impact is very small compared to the other changes in Gtk3.
I tend to agree,
hello all,
quick question:
why did you name gtk_{draw,paint}_* instead of gtk_style_*?
and lazy question:
how do object oriented language bindings handling this? I mean do
those function under the class of Gtk::Style, or stay somewhere else
as util functions?
thanks in advance.
--
13 matches
Mail list logo
