Re: Switch from http mode to tcp mode at will

another port, having the frontend and backend both in TCP mode. So thank you for this helpful explanation on the guts of the system, I believe I'll stick to what I did so far !     Hoggins! Le 30/04/2018 à 20:10, Willy Tarreau a écrit : > Hi, > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 04:53:58PM

Re: Switch from http mode to tcp mode at will

Hi, Le 30/04/2018 à 16:35, Aleksandar Lazic a écrit : > Hi. > > Am 30.04.2018 um 16:11 schrieb Hoggins!: >> Hello list, >> >> I have a case where I would like HAProxy to "get out of the way" if a >> certain pattern is detected in a HTTP request. In that

Switch from http mode to tcp mode at will

he correct practice for my case. Thanks !     Hoggins! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Trying to understand "Wordpress abuser protection" with HAProxy... and make it work !

the /wp-login.php address with POST requests (more than twice per 20s, for sure), but the counters don't raise. I'm open to new ideas on how to solve my case, and mistakes in my config. Thanks ! Hoggins! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Haproxy 1.6.5 listens on all IPv4 addresses

Thanks Cyril. I discovered the answer while you were writing yours. Sorry for the noise. Hoggins! Le 02/07/2016 22:48, Cyril Bonté a écrit : > Le 02/07/2016 à 22:45, Hoggins! a écrit : >> Oh my ! >> >> It's just happening to me on Fedora 24 with version >>

Re: Haproxy 1.6.5 listens on all IPv4 addresses

! Hoggins! Le 18/05/2016 10:30, Willy Tarreau a écrit : > Hi Vincent, > > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 09:58:33AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: >> ??? 15 mai 2016 09:55 +0200, Vincent Bernat <ber...@luffy.cx> : >> >>>> I suppose that some new features of gcc star

Re: HAProxy 1.6 in Fedora/Rawhide

.6.x packages for F23. Is there any way you could provide this ? Thanks ! Hoggins! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: There is kind of a spam issue on this ML no?

You heard the man, Arnaud. Just live with it. Cheers ! Le 12/03/2016 17:11, Willy Tarreau a écrit : >> Oh don't say that ! >> > Last time I did, I was told that I had a bad spirit, and that my >> > antispam was just bad. >> > >> > The thing is : unlike other popular mailing-lists, ANYTHING or

Re: There is kind of a spam issue on this ML no?

Oh don't say that ! Last time I did, I was told that I had a bad spirit, and that my antispam was just bad. The thing is : unlike other popular mailing-lists, ANYTHING or ANYONE can post on this one without prior subscription, hence that huge spammy noise. Hoggins! Le 11/03/2016 10:00

Re:

Le 09/11/2015 11:39, Willy Tarreau a écrit : > On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 09:55:39PM +0100, Baptiste wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This is an english mailing list! > And I just checked, he is *not* subscribed to the list! > > Willy > > Yup. I wouldn't be surprised if haproxy@formilux.org was used by bots as

Re: Spam

Oh great ! I was not aware that this list was also a nest for personal attacks. Thank you. Le 24/06/2015 16:03, Willy Tarreau a écrit : On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 02:40:51PM +0200, Hoggins! wrote: Ha ha ! We could also imagine an anti-sarcasm filter. Not needed. Anyway, that still does

Re: Spam

Ha ha ! We could also imagine an anti-sarcasm filter. Anyway, that still does not explain why such discussions on spam problems do not occur on other mailman MLs. I get a lot of spam from this ML, and *none* from others, even with a high volume of ham messages. Hoggins! Le 23/06/2015 14:37

Re: Spam

such as 3207947...@qq.com is allowed to post things about those damn LED bulbs ? Isn't there a simple way to avoid such noise by just having a whitelist of posters ? Hoggins! Le 22/06/2015 17:53, Willy Tarreau a écrit : On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 01:37:59PM +0200, Pavlos Parissis wrote: On 19/06/2015 11:08

Re: Send specific string on TCP

Hello, Le 15/01/2015 19:30, Lukas Tribus a écrit : tcp-check is for health checks only. You cannot implement a specific Layer 7 protocol via configuration. You can: - use TCP mode, without touching the TCP payload (without inserting command above) - use TCP mode with the PROXY protocol,

Send specific string on TCP

Hello folks, I'd like to use the proxy / webirc feature of ngIRCd. For that, it is required that the proxy sends the following command at the beginning of the communication : WEBIRC password username hostname ip-address (see http://ngircd.barton.de/doc/Protocol.txt, section II.4) How can I

HTTP : having /foo/ served by another backend

for your hints ! Hoggins! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: HTTP : having /foo/ served by another backend

going to find this out. Cheers ! Le 11/11/2014 14:40, Baptiste a écrit : On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Hoggins! fucks...@wheres5.com wrote: Hello folks, I'm not sure what to use, and if it's possible. I have a website : http://www.radiom.fr. The whole site is served by a couple of backend

Re: HTTP : having /foo/ served by another backend

I'm answering myself : Le 11/11/2014 15:04, Hoggins! a écrit : Wow ! That's fast ! It's a very positive aspect of HAProxy : its community. Anyway, thanks for these answers, Baptiste and Lukas. It's almost working as expected, except that I guess I need to use some sort of Apache's

HAProxy for HTTP ICES streaming

it in the docs. Thanks for your help. Hoggins! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

HAProxy and IRC

Hello guys, I would like to proxify IRC, but I'm not sure I'm doing it right. Here is my config : frontend irc-radiom bind 92.222.112.60:6667 bind 92.222.112.60:6668 bind 92.222.112.60:6669 bind 188.165.117.226:6667 bind 188.165.117.226:6668 bind 188.165.117.226:6669

Re: HAProxy and IRC

Hello, Le 08/11/2014 23:58, Cyril Bonté a écrit : Hi, Le 08/11/2014 23:41, Hoggins! a écrit : Hello guys, I would like to proxify IRC, but I'm not sure I'm doing it right. Here is my config : frontend irc-radiom bind 92.222.112.60:6667 bind 92.222.112.60:6668 bind

SSL : Strange behavior

could cause, or do you think it might be elsewhere ? Thanks a lot for your views on that, I'm kinda lost. Hoggins! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: SSL : Strange behavior

Hello, Forget about that, I'm an idiot : I had another section for HTTPS websockets, and I wrongly copied some bind sections from one to another. Sorry for the noise. Hoggins! Le 04/11/2014 23:11, Hoggins! a écrit : Hello list, I'm asking for your expertise here. I can't figure out if my

Re: HAProxy in TCP mode, but with L7 checks

Hello Baptiste, Thanks a lot, I have a working configuration ! I ended up having HAProxy answering to SSL requests, and forwarding them to SSL backends. I guess it's a bit overkill and even a bad performance hint, but right now, I cannot change the application that easily. Hoggins! Le 12/10

Asterisk / star meaning in stats

Hello, I wasn't able to find any documentation about this, I guess you all know the meaning of the little asterisk / star showing in front of : _* L7OK/200 in 124ms _Thank you !_ _ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

HAProxy in TCP mode, but with L7 checks

Hello list, This must be a stupid question, but I'm still wondering, because this would help me : I would like to perform some load-balancing between two HTTP / HTTPS backends. The HTTP operations do not pose a problem, and it's actually working absolutely fine, based on L7 checks (specific web

Lots of spam on this list

Hello, Am I the only one to be amazed by the impressive amount of spam going through this mailing-list ? I know it's very difficult to fight against it, but I'm surprised to receive so many unsolicited mails on this one. Maybe moving to a google groups list ? signature.asc Description:

Re: Lots of spam on this list

Hello, Le 18/09/2014 10:28, Olivier a écrit : Hello, 2014-09-18 10:18 GMT+02:00 Hoggins! fucks...@wheres5.com mailto:fucks...@wheres5.com: I know it's very difficult to fight against it, but I'm surprised to receive so many unsolicited mails on this one. Maybe moving

MariaDB 5.5.39 + HAProxy v1.5.3

Hello list, This is my first post. I checked a bit online to find a solution to my problem, but it seems that not many people are having the same issues. I use a very simple loadbalancing between two synchronized (Galera) MariaDB nodes. Here is the HAProxy config file : SNIP

MariaDB 5.5.39 + HAProxy v1.5.3

Hello list, This is my first post. I checked a bit online to find a solution to my problem, but it seems that not many people are having the same issues. I use a very simple loadbalancing between two synchronized (Galera) MariaDB nodes. Here is the HAProxy config file : SNIP

Re: MariaDB 5.5.39 + HAProxy v1.5.3

Wow. First post, first mistake, I hit the button twice after having corrected. Sorry, *this* is the current config I have problems with. Le 16/09/2014 15:48, Hoggins! a écrit : Hello list, This is my first post. I checked a bit online to find a solution to my problem, but it seems

Re: MariaDB 5.5.39 + HAProxy v1.5.3

Hello Cyril, Le 16/09/2014 18:54, Cyril Bonté a écrit : Hi, Le 16/09/2014 15:52, Hoggins! a écrit : (...) defaults timeout connect 5000 timeout server 5 timeout client 5 (...) If I issue the same command after a few seconds, here is what I get