Re: ~20% of HAProxy forwarded requests missing x-forwarded-for?

2015-06-02 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 10:19:30AM +1000, Daurnimator wrote: Upgrading fixed it! thanks for confirming. Willy

Re: ~20% of HAProxy forwarded requests missing x-forwarded-for?

2015-06-01 Thread Daurnimator
Upgrading fixed it! Thanks. On 29 May 2015 at 17:43, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote: On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 05:07:22PM +1000, Daurnimator wrote: On 29 May 2015 at 17:01, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote: It simply seems like you're working in tunnel mode. In versions prior to 1.5-final, by

Re: ~20% of HAProxy forwarded requests missing x-forwarded-for?

2015-05-29 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 05:07:22PM +1000, Daurnimator wrote: On 29 May 2015 at 17:01, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote: It simply seems like you're working in tunnel mode. In versions prior to 1.5-final, by default without option http-server-close, forcelose or httpclose, haproxy used to

Re: ~20% of HAProxy forwarded requests missing x-forwarded-for?

2015-05-29 Thread Daurnimator
On 29 May 2015 at 17:01, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote: It simply seems like you're working in tunnel mode. In versions prior to 1.5-final, by default without option http-server-close, forcelose or httpclose, haproxy used to work in tunnel mode, meaning that only the first request of each

Re: ~20% of HAProxy forwarded requests missing x-forwarded-for?

2015-05-29 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi, On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 03:39:59PM +1000, Daurnimator wrote: Hi! I've got a system here running HA-Proxy version 1.5-dev19 2013/06/17. The backend config contains: 'option forwardfor except 127.0.0.1' However, the backend server seems to receive approximately 20% of requests without an