Re: HAProxy with MQTT

Willy, Are there any user forums that you recommend where I can find user questions and answers related to HAProxy? Thanks, Hari Chandrasekhar On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 2:10 PM Hari Chandrasekhar wrote: > Willy, > Thank you so much for the detailed answers. That was really

Re: HAProxy with MQTT

Willy, Thank you so much for the detailed answers. That was really helpful. >From what we have seen so far, MQTT seems to be supported in almost all IOT platforms and based on our research HAProxy is the most recommended load balancer for MQTT brokers. I personally think we will be seeing a lot

Re: HAProxy + circuit breaker functionality

Hi, On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 07:27:46PM +0100, bjun...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi, > > i would like to implement a circuit breaker functionality with the help of > HAProxy. > > For example, if the average response time of the http requests of a backend > server is above a certain threshold in the

Re: different check for each backend server

Hello Stephan, On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 04:24:02PM +0100, Stephan Müller wrote: > Hello, > > i have a TCP backend with two servers. I want to check both, but with > different checks, like below: > > backend foo >mode tcp >server srv1 192.168.0.1 check# <-- do a TCP check >

different check for each backend server

Hello, i have a TCP backend with two servers. I want to check both, but with different checks, like below: backend foo mode tcp server srv1 192.168.0.1 check# <-- do a TCP check server srv2 192.168.0.2 check backup # <-- do a HTTP check I could imagine something like:

Re: confusion over dns resolution

Hi Baptiste, That's very helpful. I wish we could add your examples section to the official documentation because it helps clear up the maths. Komu W. On 04/11/2016, Baptiste wrote: > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 3:55 PM, komu wairagu wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >>

Re: confusion over dns resolution

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 3:55 PM, komu wairagu wrote: > Hi guys, > > I'm a little confused by the wording on the official haproxy ver1.6 > documentation(https://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/1.6/ > configuration.html) > especially as concerning dns resolution. > > Here's a

Re: Understanding huge RAM utilisation diff between 1.5.18 and 1.6.9

Hi! On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 06:33:29PM +0530, Jagbir wrote: > Hi, > > I've upgraded haproxy from 1.5.18 to 1.6.9 and perplexed to see huge drop > in memory utilisation (1.5.18 almost consuming 4x more RAM). Would like to > understand whether it's due to certain improvements/bug fixes (I've

confusion over dns resolution

Hi guys, I'm a little confused by the wording on the official haproxy ver1.6 documentation(https://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/1.6/configuration.html) especially as concerning dns resolution. Here's a section of my haproxy config: ## start config resolvers my_dns_resolver #Google name

unsubscribe

unsubscribe

[PATCH] Enable Scientiamobile WURFL device detection module

Hi All, This patch will make Scientiamobile WURFL device detection features available in HAProxy It applies to version 1.7 WURFL is a high-performance and low-memory footprint mobile device detection software component that can quickly and accurately detect over 500 capabilities of visiting

Understanding huge RAM utilisation diff between 1.5.18 and 1.6.9

Hi, I've upgraded haproxy from 1.5.18 to 1.6.9 and perplexed to see huge drop in memory utilisation (1.5.18 almost consuming 4x more RAM). Would like to understand whether it's due to certain improvements/bug fixes (I've glanced through change log but didn't notice anything significant in this

Re: HAProxy with MQTT

Hi Hari, On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 04:08:37PM +, Hari Chandrasekhar wrote: > Hello, >Our team is planning to use HAProxy as a TCP load balancer for MQTT > servers. We don't have much familiarity with the HAProxy set up. > So we would like to get some clarity on how the process would work.