[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-107) Data-nodes should be formatted when the name-node is formatted.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13049002#comment-13049002 ] Konstantin Shvachko commented on HDFS-107: -- I agree with Todd and others. Option

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-2053) NameNode detects Inconsistent diskspace for directories with quota-enabled subdirectories (introduced by HDFS-1377)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2053?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13049206#comment-13049206 ] Michael Noll commented on HDFS-2053: Hi Eli, many thanks for your quick reply and

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-107) Data-nodes should be formatted when the name-node is formatted.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13049234#comment-13049234 ] Uma Maheswara Rao G commented on HDFS-107: -- I agree with you, But Removing complete

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-107) Data-nodes should be formatted when the name-node is formatted.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13049252#comment-13049252 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HDFS-107: -- I think it would be better to move them the new storage

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-1734) 'Chunk size to view' option is not working in Name Node UI.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1734?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HDFS-1734: --- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) 'Chunk size to view' option is not working in

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-1734) 'Chunk size to view' option is not working in Name Node UI.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1734?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HDFS-1734: --- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) 'Chunk size to view' option is not working in

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-941) Datanode xceiver protocol should allow reuse of a connection

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13049278#comment-13049278 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HDFS-941: -- Looks good to me. How'd the test run go? Datanode

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-1739) When DataNode throws DiskOutOfSpaceException, it will be helpfull to the user if we log the available volume size and configured block size.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uma Maheswara Rao G updated HDFS-1739: -- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) When DataNode throws DiskOutOfSpaceException, it

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-1739) When DataNode throws DiskOutOfSpaceException, it will be helpfull to the user if we log the available volume size and configured block size.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uma Maheswara Rao G updated HDFS-1739: -- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) When DataNode throws DiskOutOfSpaceException, it

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-1942) If all Block Pool service threads exit then datanode should exit.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bharath Mundlapudi updated HDFS-1942: - Attachment: HDFS-1942-2.patch Attaching a patch with some test cleanup. Reduced the test

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-107) Data-nodes should be formatted when the name-node is formatted.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13049349#comment-13049349 ] Konstantin Shvachko commented on HDFS-107: -- Uma, your approach doesn't work, if I

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-1734) 'Chunk size to view' option is not working in Name Node UI.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1734?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13049381#comment-13049381 ] Jitendra Nath Pandey commented on HDFS-1734: +1 for the patch. I will commit

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-1989) When checkpointing by backup node occurs parallely when a file is being closed by a client then Exception occurs saying no journal streams.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13049380#comment-13049380 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HDFS-1989: --- saveNamespace should only be happening while in

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-2011) Removal and restoration of storage directories on checkpointing failure doesn't work properly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13049387#comment-13049387 ] Matt Foley commented on HDFS-2011: -- Ravi, I don't think this collides with HDFS-988, but

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-1692) In secure mode, Datanode process doesn't exit when disks fail.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bharath Mundlapudi updated HDFS-1692: - Affects Version/s: 0.23.0 Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 In secure mode, Datanode process

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-1692) In secure mode, Datanode process doesn't exit when disks fail.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bharath Mundlapudi updated HDFS-1692: - Attachment: HDFS-1692-v0.23-1.patch Attaching a patch for version 0.23. In secure mode,

[jira] [Assigned] (HDFS-1977) Stop using StringUtils.stringifyException()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bharath Mundlapudi reassigned HDFS-1977: Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi Stop using StringUtils.stringifyException()

[jira] [Resolved] (HDFS-2072) Remove StringUtils.stringifyException(ie) in logger functions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bharath Mundlapudi resolved HDFS-2072. -- Resolution: Duplicate Remove StringUtils.stringifyException(ie) in logger functions

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-1977) Stop using StringUtils.stringifyException()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13049438#comment-13049438 ] Bharath Mundlapudi commented on HDFS-1977: -- The newer logging API supports

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-1977) Stop using StringUtils.stringifyException()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bharath Mundlapudi updated HDFS-1977: - Attachment: HDFS-1977-1.patch Attaching a patch. Stop using

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-941) Datanode xceiver protocol should allow reuse of a connection

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13049456#comment-13049456 ] stack commented on HDFS-941: Bit odd. These failed when I ran all tests: {code} [junit]

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-941) Datanode xceiver protocol should allow reuse of a connection

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13049457#comment-13049457 ] stack commented on HDFS-941: Or, hang on...(240 minutes) and let me rerun these tests and see if

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-1942) If all Block Pool service threads exit then datanode should exit.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bharath Mundlapudi updated HDFS-1942: - Attachment: HDFS-1942-3.patch Attaching a patch. Cleaned up some more code. If all

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-1942) If all Block Pool service threads exit then datanode should exit.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HDFS-1942: -- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) If all Block Pool service threads exit then datanode

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-941) Datanode xceiver protocol should allow reuse of a connection

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13049500#comment-13049500 ] Konstantin Shvachko commented on HDFS-941: -- Could anybody please run DFSIO to make

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-2073) Namenode is missing @Override annotations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HDFS-2073: -- Attachment: HDFS-2073.patch Patch with changes proposed in the description. Also along with

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-2073) Namenode is missing @Override annotations

Namenode is missing @Override annotations - Key: HDFS-2073 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2073 Project: Hadoop HDFS Issue Type: Improvement Components: name-node Affects

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-941) Datanode xceiver protocol should allow reuse of a connection

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13049515#comment-13049515 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HDFS-941: -- Cos: do you have any reason to believe there would be?

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-941) Datanode xceiver protocol should allow reuse of a connection

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13049526#comment-13049526 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HDFS-941: -- oops, sorry Konstantin - didn't mean to call you Cos.

[jira] [Resolved] (HDFS-1836) Thousand of CLOSE_WAIT socket

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Foley resolved HDFS-1836. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: 0.20.205.0) Committed to 0.20-security for .206

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-941) Datanode xceiver protocol should allow reuse of a connection

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13049537#comment-13049537 ] Konstantin Shvachko commented on HDFS-941: -- Yes in the previous

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-2074) 1073: determine edit log validity by truly reading and validating transactions

1073: determine edit log validity by truly reading and validating transactions -- Key: HDFS-2074 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2074 Project: Hadoop HDFS

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-2074) 1073: determine edit log validity by truly reading and validating transactions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HDFS-2074: -- Description: HDFS-2003 separated the deserialization/reading of log records from the application of

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-2074) 1073: determine edit log validity by truly reading and validating transactions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HDFS-2074: -- Component/s: name-node Affects Version/s: Edit log branch (HDFS-1073) Fix Version/s:

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-2045) HADOOP_*_HOME environment variables no longer work for tar ball distributions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13049576#comment-13049576 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HDFS-2045: -- In the absence of compatibility concerns, I

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-2026) 1073: 2NN needs to handle case of reformatted NN better

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13049606#comment-13049606 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HDFS-2026: --- I should note that the patch does *not* add a

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-2026) 1073: 2NN needs to handle case of reformatted NN better

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HDFS-2026: -- Attachment: hdfs-2026.txt Here's a patch which does the following: - when 2NN talks to NN or NN talks

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-1942) If all Block Pool service threads exit then datanode should exit.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13049610#comment-13049610 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-1942: - -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-1739) When DataNode throws DiskOutOfSpaceException, it will be helpfull to the user if we log the available volume size and configured block size.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13049611#comment-13049611 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-1739: - -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-1734) 'Chunk size to view' option is not working in Name Node UI.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1734?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13049617#comment-13049617 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-1734: - -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-1734) 'Chunk size to view' option is not working in Name Node UI.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1734?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13049619#comment-13049619 ] Uma Maheswara Rao G commented on HDFS-1734: --- Test failures are not related to

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-1739) When DataNode throws DiskOutOfSpaceException, it will be helpfull to the user if we log the available volume size and configured block size.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13049622#comment-13049622 ] Uma Maheswara Rao G commented on HDFS-1739: --- Test failures are not related to