[heketi-devel] Update the Heketi package for the CentOS Storage SIG?

Hi, currently heketi-1.0.2-1.el7 is the version that is available in the CentOS Storage SIG (for CentOS 7). I am currently preparing for the GlusterFS 3.10 release in the Storage SIG, and would like to know if I should update the Heketi package there as well. Thanks, Niels signature.asc

[heketi-devel] Heketi is being added to the Gluster repositories from the CentOS Storage SIG

Hi, I've added golang-1.8.3-1.2.1.el7 to the buildroot for the Gluster repositories in the CentOS Storage SIG. This makes it possible to build recent versions of Heketi for CentOS 7 (x86_64, aarch64, ppc64le). It does not look like CentOS 6 has access to golang packages. So I'm not planning to

Re: [heketi-devel] [Gluster-devel] Heketi version 5 has been released!

On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 11:08:55AM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:32:02PM +0200, Michael Adam wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > > > Heketi version 5 has just been released. > > Congrats with the new release! > > > Here i

Re: [heketi-devel] [Gluster-devel] Heketi version 5 has been released!

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:32:02PM +0200, Michael Adam wrote: > Hi all, > > > Heketi version 5 has just been released. Congrats with the new release! > Here is the high-level changelog since version 4: > > - Set Gluster Volume options based on user input. > - Allow disperse volumes to be 2+1.

[heketi-devel] Fwd: FOSDEM Call for Participation: Software Defined Storage devroom

- Forwarded message from Jan Fajerski - > Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 12:55:28 +0200 > From: Jan Fajerski > To: ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org, ceph-us...@ceph.com, gluster-us...@gluster.org > Cc: devroom-manag...@lists.fosdem.org, fos...@lists.fosdem.org

Re: [heketi-devel] Fwd: FOSDEM Call for Participation: Software Defined Storage devroom

Reminder! The Call for Participation ends later this week. There is still time to propose talks. On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 12:41:35PM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote: > - Forwarded message from Jan Fajerski <jfajer...@suse.com> - > > > Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 12:55:28 +

Re: [heketi-devel] Heketi v5.0.1 security release available for download

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 06:10:29PM +0100, Michael Adam wrote: > > Heketi v5.0.1 is now available. Packages for the CentOS Storage SIG are now becomnig available in the testing repository. Packages can be obtained (soon) with the following steps: # yum --enablerepo=centos-gluster*-test update

[heketi-devel] Proposal to provide Heketi containers in the CentOS Container Registry

I'd like to get container images built with the CentOS Storage SIG components in the CentOS Container Registry[0]. With this, I hope to be able to provide a solid user experience, and a more stable build process (the images on dockerhub still fail building[1]?). For this, I've sent a PR[2] with

Re: [heketi-devel] [RFC] Initial proposal for snapshot/cloning support

Hi again! The majority of the emails still stands, but the document has been updated a little with early comments. The location is still the same, and the updated version has been included below. Niels On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 05:17:44PM +0100, Niels de Vos wrote: > Hi, > > as we w

Re: [heketi-devel] Does anyone object to removing the python bindings for the Heketi client?

that might be OK, but the binding themselves will continue to exist > and I hope to use them more for tests in heketi's own repo. If the intention is to use it only for testing, then I'll drop it. Otherwise we can keep the Python bindings. What is your suggestion or preference? Niels > On Sunda

[heketi-devel] Does anyone object to removing the python bindings for the Heketi client?

The Fedora package currently fails to build for Rawhide (Fedora 29) because the python bindings under client/api/python have a requirement on Python 2. I do not know how much work it is to make the bindings compatible with both Python 2 and 3. Before spending time on this, I would like to know if

Re: [heketi-devel] Time for a new release?

On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 08:56:15AM -0400, John Mulligan wrote: > I think we ought to do a version 8 release within the next week or so. A lot > of patches have gone in on master that improve the reliability and management > of Heketi and I think it would be good for users who are not running

[heketi-devel] Dynamic provisioning does not provide the amount of 'free space' that was requested

The KubeVirt team found a bug in how Heketi provisions requested volumes (PVCs). The problem that they hit is related to how much overhead a filesystem needs vs how much free space is expected. This comes down to the following: - Heketi gets asked to provision a volume of 4GB - checking the

Re: [heketi-devel] Heketi v8.0.0 available for download

On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 07:43:47PM -0400, John Mulligan wrote: > Heketi v8.0.0 is now available [1]. > > This is the new stable version of Heketi. > > Major additions in this release: > * Resumable delete of Volumes and Block Volumes > * Server administrative modes > * Throttling of concurrent

Re: [heketi-devel] [registry.centos.org] FAILED: Container build gluster/storagesig-heketi:latest

On Sun, Sep 08, 2019 at 11:18:45AM -0400, John Mulligan wrote: > Can whoever has control of these stop sending these messages to the heketi- > devel list? I am a maintainer of the project but I have zero insight into > what > makes these builds pass or fail and the messages themselves provide