Re: [GNU Make 4.2.1] Implicit rule not used

2016-10-01 Thread Philip Guenther
On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Jari Vetoniemi wrote: > I have Makefile where implict rule is not used for target that is > prerequisite of another target. > > You can see the Makefile here: > https://ptpb.pw/WxM9 (putting a makefile that's about the same size as your email

[GNU Make 4.2.1] Implicit rule not used

2016-10-01 Thread Jari Vetoniemi
Hi, I have Makefile where implict rule is not used for target that is prerequisite of another target. You can see the Makefile here: https://ptpb.pw/WxM9 If I remove the recipe from vitaserve target GNU/Make will not use the implicit rule '%: %.c' for the target. Is this a bug in GNU/Make or am

"inline" using a variable

2016-10-01 Thread Russell Shaw
Hi, When i "configured" binutils in a directory separate to the source directory, it generates a 11500 line Makefile containing the following fragment. Down the bottom it does: $(MAKE) $(RECURSE_FLAGS_TO_PASS) all-stage1; but "all-stage1" is not in the Makefile. I think it's got something

Re: GNU Make Windows: absolute path to the file that contains the Make file that is currently being interpreted by Make.

2016-10-01 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Denis BEURIVE > Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 23:15:42 +0200 > > I use to use GNU Make under UNIX, but (unfortunately), I have to work under > Windows. This is not my cup of tea… and I have the MSDOS, which is a > prehistoric tool. However, I have no choice. What do