On 25 Jul 2018, at 04:13, Ted Lemon mailto:mel...@fugue.com>>
wrote:
Well, the charter certainly says that we're supposed to think about homenet's
impact on manageability. Granted, that's a thin reed to hang on, and it would
probably be better to make the charter more explicit. But to be
On 25/07/2018 14:59, STARK, BARBARA H wrote:
> Since homenet is supposed to be about an unmanaged network,
> and configuration via a management protocol requires somebody who knows what
> they’re doing,
Traditionally, yes, but we do actually want to get away from that.
(It's our explicit goal
Well, the charter certainly says that we're supposed to think about
homenet's impact on manageability. Granted, that's a thin reed to hang
on, and it would probably be better to make the charter more explicit.
But to be clear here, all home networks have user interfaces, and this is
all we are
Since homenet is supposed to be about an unmanaged network,
and configuration via a management protocol requires somebody who knows what
they’re doing, it doesn’t fall within my interpretation of the charter.
Barbara
From: homenet On Behalf Of Ted Lemon
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2018 5:57 PM
I don't think using HNCP in that particular way is a great plan, but I'm
willing to be convinced. I would hope that this is in charter.
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 5:48 PM, Michael Richardson
wrote:
>
> I very much like the idea of having a standard way to configure homenets.
> There is the
I very much like the idea of having a standard way to configure homenets.
There is the YANG/NETCONF method, and I think that we should go in that
direction.
A thought I had though could a HOMENET configuration be recorded by
capturing just HNCP traffic? Could a network configuration be
Hi Denis,
Thanks for the feed back! The big read arrow symbolized the synchronization
between the zone hosted on your HNA and the DNS Public server on the
outsourcing infrastructure. This could be your ISP or any third party. One
of the motivation to outsource was to prevent DDoS attack on the
My personal feeling on this is that the off-site backup zone is a service
that could be provided by an ISP, could be provided by someone else, or
could just be something that a sufficiently geeky user sets up for
themself. If an ISP connection is as flaky as you describe, I would think
that they
Hello group.
What I was trying to say at the WG meeting was the following. Looking at the
slide with the red arrow between a DNS server in the home network and a DNS
server somewhere on the Internet, the following scenario immediately came to my
mind.
1. A home network is connected to the
Hi homenet,
Draft minutes have been posted.
Thx to Phill Hallam-Baker for taking them.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/102/materials/minutes-102-homenet-01.html
Please let us know if you think they need changes.
Barbara and Stephen
___
homenet
You said that having state in the homenet makes it brittle. That implies
that you think a stateless homenet will be less brittle, no?
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 4:34 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> > Juliusz is saying that he wants a nearly stateless homenet;
>
> No, I'm not.
>
> > for him,
> Juliusz is saying that he wants a nearly stateless homenet;
No, I'm not.
> for him, putting the public/primary functional block in the cloud makes
> sense
No, it doesn't.
Ted, please don't put words into my mouth. It's unpleasant, and it's
disrespectful.
-- Juliusz
12 matches
Mail list logo
