On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 18:57 -0400, Tony Thompson wrote:
The request URL is perfectly valid.
The response from the server seems to suggest otherwise
As I stated in an earlier email, I
can do this same exact thing WITHOUT forcing a connection closed before
the POST and it works fine. If I
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 12:09 -0400, Tony Thompson wrote:
Well, according to the debug I provided, yes, everything probably
appears fine.
Tony,
I see no reason to not trust the output of the wirelog.
But, a packet trace says otherwise. In one of my earlier
emails I pointed out that a
In my opinion the traffic analyzer misinterprets the packets. It
detected the 'content-length: 21' header and mistakenly displayed the
first 21 bytes of the next request head as the content of the previous
one.
Yeah, stupid Wireshark. Once I looked at it closer, it is reassembling
that
