I haven't posted here before so let me start by thanking you guys for the great
work.
We are using 3.0.1 in some pretty heavy production environments. A recent
issue arose with a customer who had trouble during SSL handshakes. The
negotiation was timing out:
[120009]
again.
Gerry
-Original Message-
From: Oleg Kalnichevski [mailto:ol...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 3:08 AM
To: HttpClient User Discussion
Subject: Re: CLOSE_WAIT on Linux
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 09:36:20PM -0700, Gerry Woods wrote:
I haven't posted here before so let me start
The new APIs are much cleaner, and definitely less buggy than 3.x. Considering
the effort the guys have put in to providing a robust, consistent, and not to
mention free library for our use, I think you need to get over yourself. If
you want to stick with 3.x you are free to do so. If not,
We just went through this exercise. We have our own socket factory
implementation that, based on HTTPCLIENT-1119, uses the String host name when
SSLSocketFactory.createSocket() is invoked (rather than using the InetAddress
methods). This seemed to do the trick.
On 3/2/16, 12:48 PM, "Sam
