On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 08:51 +1000, Steven Adams wrote:
But org.apache.http.wire is right?
Yes, it is.
Oleg
-Original Message-
From: Sam Berlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 5 June 2008 12:03 AM
To: HttpClient User Discussion
Subject: Re: Log4j with Httpclient 4.x
Discussion
Subject: Re: Log4j with Httpclient 4.x
On 02/06/2008, Steven Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to get log4j working with httpclient 4.x.
My properties file looks like the following..
SNIP
logj4.logger.org.apache.commons.httpclient=DEBUG, httc
logj4
for using httpclient with log4j..
Thanks
Steve
-Original Message-
From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 4 June 2008 9:37 PM
To: HttpClient User Discussion
Subject: Re: Log4j with Httpclient 4.x
On 04/06/2008, Steven Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I know it's
file looks right for using httpclient with log4j..
Thanks
Steve
-Original Message-
From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 4 June 2008 9:37 PM
To: HttpClient User Discussion
Subject: Re: Log4j with Httpclient 4.x
On 04/06/2008, Steven Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
But org.apache.http.wire is right?
-Original Message-
From: Sam Berlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 5 June 2008 12:03 AM
To: HttpClient User Discussion
Subject: Re: Log4j with Httpclient 4.x
s/patch/path
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Sam Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
