On 8/28/16 16:20, Susan Hares wrote:
Joe:
Let's start with the overview, and then go down to words.
My concern:
The phrasing of this impacts the OPSTATE discussions for Juergen. Juergen
is pushing for ephemeral to just be operational state. Other drafts are
pushing for ephemeral state to be
Joe:
Let's start with the overview, and then go down to words.
My concern:
The phrasing of this impacts the OPSTATE discussions for Juergen. Juergen
is pushing for ephemeral to just be operational state. Other drafts are
pushing for ephemeral state to be configuration and ephemeral state. I
On 8/28/16 11:35, Susan Hares wrote:
I think this is good. A general comment I have is that "ephemeral state"
is used in a number of places where I think "ephemeral configuration" should
be used. >This may be a nit, but the device has one state that is dictated
by the various configuration
Joe:
I'm sorry I missed responding you on August 2nd. It appears I wrote the
message and then did not send it.Please see comments below. All changes
except the ephemeral state--> ephemeral configuration work for me (WFM).
Would you take a moment to look at that point, and then I will
Joe:
Russ indicated that I forgot to respond to you. I apologize. Watch for the
response momentarily.
Sue
-Original Message-
From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Joe Clarke
Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2016 10:30 AM
To: Russ White; i2rs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [i2rs]
Russ:
I believe you meant the ephemeral state has completed its working group last
call. We did not have a WG LC on the I2RS RIB.
Sue
-Original Message-
From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Russ White
Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2016 7:26 AM
To: i2rs@ietf.org
Russ,
The email subject and the content of the email are different.
Are you referring to the draft on ephemeral state or on the RIB info model? I
presume it is on RIB info model, but will let you clarify it
Dean
> On Aug 28, 2016, at 13:26, Russ White <7ri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Y'all --
>
Y'all --
The I2RS WG LC on the RIB Informational Model completed on the 15th of
August. We let it run a little long, but it appears the WG has reached
consensus on this document. The next steps for this document are Shepherd
reviews and routing-area reviews prior to submission to the IESG.
Russ
