Re: [IAEP] SCaLE 17X March7 -10, 2019

2018-12-23 Thread Walter Bender
On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 7:51 PM Caryl Bigenho wrote: > > P.S. To Walter... what is the size of the Sugar Labs banner you have? > It is about 30 inches wide and 72 inches tall. Self-standing. -walter -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org

Re: [IAEP] SCaLE 17X March7 -10, 2019

2018-12-23 Thread Samson Goddy
On Sun, Dec 23, 2018, 5:17 PM Caryl Bigenho Hi Kenneth and all... my reference to Windows is only to say we should try > to show that Sugar can run on whatever hardware they happen to have. We > won’t be running Windows but it would be nice to have SOAS running on a > machine that is a Windows

Re: [IAEP] SCaLE 17X March7 -10, 2019

2018-12-23 Thread Caryl Bigenho
Hi Kenneth and all... my reference to Windows is only to say we should try to show that Sugar can run on whatever hardware they happen to have. We won’t be running Windows but it would be nice to have SOAS running on a machine that is a Windows machine. Caryl Sent from my iPhone > On Dec

Re: [IAEP] SCaLE 17X March7 -10, 2019

2018-12-22 Thread Caryl Bigenho
Hi Alex... and all... I also have several XOs that I can bring to SCaLE, including one of the blue high school models. I have never been much of a fan of SOAS because it never worked well and reliably when I tried it. When it first came out I did a workshop at a CUE-LA conference and no one

Re: [IAEP] SCaLE 17X March7 -10, 2019

2018-12-21 Thread Dave Crossland
Fair enough Given the tiny size of the present community, I find it hard to understand why if all such messages are in a muted thread, it would bother me :) On Fri, Dec 21, 2018, 7:22 PM Alex Perez Dave, > > It's not about 'splintering' discussion. There are a lot of logistics > for a physical

Re: [IAEP] SCaLE 17X March7 -10, 2019

2018-12-21 Thread Walter Bender
I have a Sugar Labs banner that I can make available. On Fri, Dec 21, 2018, 7:22 PM Alex Perez Dave, > > It's not about 'splintering' discussion. There are a lot of logistics > for a physical event, from "I'll bring X, Y, Z" to "meet us here on > Friday" that simply _should not_ be happening on

Re: [IAEP] SCaLE 17X March7 -10, 2019

2018-12-21 Thread Alex Perez
Dave, It's not about 'splintering' discussion. There are a lot of logistics for a physical event, from "I'll bring X, Y, Z" to "meet us here on Friday" that simply _should not_ be happening on the iaep mailing list. Dave Crossland wrote: I agree with Caryl, in that unlike me and the 229

Re: [IAEP] SCaLE 17X March7 -10, 2019

2018-12-21 Thread Alex Perez
Caryl, Don't take it personally. While I agree James' comment was unfortunate, I do also understand what he was trying to say. I find it to have been worded quite poorly. We should all move on with the discussion. Caryl, can you share your thoughts on what additions, as well as deletions,

Re: [IAEP] SCaLE 17X March7 -10, 2019

2018-12-21 Thread James Cameron
eclare themselves better than anyone else as > James has done in his note to Alex, sent to all of us below. > > Caryl > ━━━ > From: IAEP on behalf of James Cameron > > Sent: Friday, December 21, 2018 1:

Re: [IAEP] SCaLE 17X March7 -10, 2019

2018-12-21 Thread Dave Crossland
EP on behalf of James > Cameron > *Sent:* Friday, December 21, 2018 1:04 PM > *To:* iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org > *Subject:* Re: [IAEP] SCaLE 17X March7 -10, 2019 > > Thanks Alex, > > Don't worry about Tony and Caryl. Like the other 230 or so > subscribers, they are too b

Re: [IAEP] SCaLE 17X March7 -10, 2019

2018-12-21 Thread Caryl Bigenho
than anyone else as James has done in his note to Alex, sent to all of us below. Caryl From: IAEP on behalf of James Cameron Sent: Friday, December 21, 2018 1:04 PM To: iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org Subject: Re: [IAEP] SCaLE 17X March7 -10, 2019 Thanks Alex, Don't wor

Re: [IAEP] SCaLE 17X March7 -10, 2019

2018-12-21 Thread James Cameron
Thanks Alex, Don't worry about Tony and Caryl. Like the other 230 or so subscribers, they are too busy to be involved. Rest of us on event-planning can keep them updated with occasional posts to IAEP. In other words; we split our messaging; for the too busy uninvolved we will say different

Re: [IAEP] SCaLE 17X March7 -10, 2019

2018-12-21 Thread Alex Perez
Caryl, The fact of the matter is that there really are 240 subscribers on the IAEP mailing list :) That said, I'm sure the percentage of folks who actually bother to read, much less participate, in these conversations is a tiny fraction of that. As far as the banner goes, my personal

Re: [IAEP] SCaLE 17X March7 -10, 2019

2018-12-21 Thread Caryl Bigenho
Hi Again... Tony Anderson would like to see us keep this discussion on the iaep list, and I agree with him. If there are really 240 subscribers, please let's hear from more of you! This is all about "marketing" Sugar and everyone should have an interest in that! (See the PS below) Let's

Re: [IAEP] SCaLE 17X March7 -10, 2019

2018-12-20 Thread Alex Perez
Caryl & others, I have removed all of the recipients who are already members of the IAEP mailing list from the CC: list, so they do not receive duplicate e-mails. I will be in attendance at SCaLE 17x, along with my wife, who is currently a first grade schoolteacher, and has taught second